David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Global Politics 1 (2008)
In this essay, I analyze the cosmopolitan project for a new international order that Habermas has articulated in recent publications. I argue that his presentation of the project oscillates between two models. The first is a very ambitious model for a future international order geared to fulfill the peace and human rights goals of the UN Charter. The second is a minimalist model, in which the obligation to protect human rights by the international community is circumscribed to the negative duty of preventing wars of aggression and massive human rights violations due to armed conflicts such as ethnic cleansing or genocide. According to this model, any more ambitious goals should be left to a global domestic politics, which would have to come about through negotiated compromises among domesticated major powers at the transnational level. I defend the ambitious model by arguing that there is no basis for drawing a normatively significant distinction between massive human rights violations due to armed conflicts and those due to regulations of the global economic order. I conclude that the cosmopolitan goals of the Habermasian project can only be achieved if the principles of transnational justice recognized by the international community are ambitious enough to cover economic justice
|Keywords||Global poverty Global justice Habermas Human rights Cosmopolitanism Distributive justice Realistic utopias Negative duties|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gillian Brock (2005). Egalitarianism, Ideals, and Cosmopolitan Justice. Philosophical Forum 36 (1):1–30.
Robert Van Gulick (2004). Higher-Order Global States : An Alternative Higher-Order Model of Consciousness. In Rocco J. Gennaro (ed.), Higher-Order Theories of Consciousness: An Anthology. John Benjamins
Patti Tamara Lenard (2010). Motivating Cosmopolitanism? A Skeptical View. Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (3):346-371.
Daniel Weinstock (2009). Motivating the Global Demos. Metaphilosophy 40 (1):92-108.
John Cartwright (2004). From Aquinas to Zwelethemba: A Brief History of Hope. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
Paulina Tambakaki (2009). Cosmopolitanism or Agonism? Alternative Visions of World Order. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (1):101-116.
Jeong Hyoung Wook (2008). The Global Ecological Crisis and the Ideology of Gaebyeok and Sangsaeng. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 29:45-49.
Thomas Nagel (2005). The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):113–147.
Tim Hayward (2009). International Political Theory and the Global Environment: Some Critical Questions for Liberal Cosmopolitans. Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (2):276-295.
Bruce Landesman (2012). Brock’s Cosmopolitanism: Sensible but Incomplete. Diametros 31 (31):146-156.
Lauge Baungaard Rasmussen (2013). Cultural Visions of Technology. AI and Society 28 (2):177-188.
Rekha Nath (2011). Equal Standing in the Global Community. The Monist 94 (4):593-614.
Cristina Lafont (2010). Can Democracy Go Global? Ethics and Global Politics 3 (1):13-19.
Kate Macdonald & Terry Macdonald (2010). Democracy in a Pluralist Global Order: Corporate Power and Stakeholder Representation. Ethics and International Affairs 24 (1):19-43.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads26 ( #143,114 of 1,790,506 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #83,896 of 1,790,506 )
How can I increase my downloads?