Alternative visions of a new global order: what should cosmopolitans hope for?

Abstract
In this essay, I analyze the cosmopolitan project for a new international order that Habermas has articulated in recent publications. I argue that his presentation of the project oscillates between two models. The first is a very ambitious model for a future international order geared to fulfill the peace and human rights goals of the UN Charter. The second is a minimalist model, in which the obligation to protect human rights by the international community is circumscribed to the negative duty of preventing wars of aggression and massive human rights violations due to armed conflicts such as ethnic cleansing or genocide. According to this model, any more ambitious goals should be left to a global domestic politics, which would have to come about through negotiated compromises among domesticated major powers at the transnational level. I defend the ambitious model by arguing that there is no basis for drawing a normatively significant distinction between massive human rights violations due to armed conflicts and those due to regulations of the global economic order. I conclude that the cosmopolitan goals of the Habermasian project can only be achieved if the principles of transnational justice recognized by the international community are ambitious enough to cover economic justice
Keywords Global poverty  Global justice  Habermas  Human rights  Cosmopolitanism  Distributive justice  Realistic utopias  Negative duties
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 13,029
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
John Cartwright (2004). From Aquinas to Zwelethemba: A Brief History of Hope. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
Paulina Tambakaki (2009). Cosmopolitanism or Agonism? Alternative Visions of World Order. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (1):101-116.
Thomas Nagel (2005). The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):113–147.
Cristina Lafont (2010). Can Democracy Go Global? Ethics and Global Politics 3 (1):13-19.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-08-24

Total downloads

14 ( #129,339 of 1,410,464 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #107,949 of 1,410,464 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.