David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Political Theory 32 (2):172-185 (2004)
This essay attempts to sharpen significantly the critical debate around Levinas's work by focussing on the question of politics, which is, it is argued, Levinas's Achilles'heel. Five problems in Levinas's treatment of politics are identified and discussed: fraternity, monotheism, androcentrism, the family, and Israel. It is argued that Levinas 's ethics is terribly compromised by his conception of politics. In order to save Levinasian ethics from this compromise, two possibilities are explored: first, to follow Derrida 's separation of ethical form from political content in his recent reading of Levinas, which allows for a notion of political invention linked to ethical responsibility, and second, to link Levinas's conception of ethics to what is called in the essay the anarchistic disturbance of politics. In conclusion, this anarchistic experience of ethics in linked to a quite different understanding of politics as the dissensual space of democracy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mollie Painter-Morland (2010). Questioning Corporate Codes of Ethics. Business Ethics 19 (3):265-279.
Mollie Painter-Morland (2010). Questioning Corporate Codes of Ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review 19 (3):265-279.
Michael Fagenblat (2015). ‘The Passion of Israel’: The True Israel According to Levinas, or Judaism ‘as a Category of Being’. Sophia 54 (3):297-320.
Similar books and articles
Diane Perpich (2008). The Ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford University Press.
V. Tahmasebi (2010). Does Levinas Justify or Transcend Liberalism? Levinas on Human Liberation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (5):523-544.
Mark Dooley (2001). The Civic Religion of Social Hope: A Reply to Simon Critchley. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (5):35-58.
Cheryl L. Hughes (1998). The Primacy of Ethics: Hobbes and Levinas. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 31 (1):79-94.
Tina Chanter (2001). Time, Death, and the Feminine: Levinas with Heidegger. Stanford University Press.
Jesse Sims (2005). Absolute Adversity: Schmitt, Levinas, and the Exceptionality of Killing. Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (2):223-252.
John Drabinski (2008). On Subjectivity and Political Debt. Levinas Studies 3:101-115.
William Simmons (1999). The Third: Levinas' Theoretical Move From an-Archical Ethics to the Realm of Justice and Politics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (6):83-104.
John Drabinski (2000). The Possibility of an Ethical Politics: From Peace to Liturgy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (4):49-73.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #126,342 of 1,790,294 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #267,458 of 1,790,294 )
How can I increase my downloads?