Religious Studies 39 (1):23-41 (2003)
|Abstract||In this article I assess the coherence of Jonathan Edwards's doctrine of divine simplicity as an instance of an actus purus account of perfect-being theology. Edwards's view is an idiosyncratic version of this doctrine. This is due to a number of factors including his idealism and the Trinitarian context from which he developed his notion of simplicity. These complicating factors lead to a number of serious problems for his account, particularly with respect to the opera extra sunt indivisa principle. I conclude that Edwards sets out an interesting and subtle version of the doctrine, but one which appears mired in difficulties from which he is unable to extract himself.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrew Pessin (2010). Divine Simplicity and the Eternal Truths: Descartes and the Scholastics. Philosophia 38 (1):69-105.
Sang Hyun Lee (2000). The Philosophical Theology of Jonathan Edwards. Princeton University Press.
Philip L. Quinn (2003). Honoring Jonathan Edwards. Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (2):299 - 321.
William Wainwright, Jonathan Edwards. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Mohammad Saeedimehr (2007). Divine Simplicity. Topoi 26 (2):191-199.
Jonathan Edwards (2009). Jonathan Edwards, Freedom of the Will, The Works of Jonathan Edward, Vol. I. Yale University Press.
Jeffrey E. Brower (2008). Making Sense of Divine Simplicity. Faith and Philosophy 25 (1):3-30.
Jonathan Edwards (1995). A Jonathan Edwards Reader. Yale University Press.
Graham Oppy (2003). The Devilish Complexities of Divine Simplicity. Philo 6 (1):10-22.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads85 ( #10,756 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,438 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?