Original sin and atonement
In Thomas P. Flint & Michael C. Rea (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press (2008)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRichard Swinburne (1988). The Christian Scheme of Salvation. In Thomas V. Morris (ed.), Philosophy and the Christian Faith. Univ. Of Notre Dame Press.
Steven S. Aspenson (1996). Swinburne on Atonement. Religious Studies 32 (2):187 - 204.
Sandra Visser (2009). Anselm. Oxford University Press.
Richard Cross (2001). Atonement Without Satisfaction. Religious Studies 37 (4):397-416.
Geoffrey Rees (2003). The Anxiety of Inheritance: Reinhold Niebuhr and the Literal Truth of Original Sin. Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (1):75 - 99.
Simon Heans (2013). Original Sin or Original Sinfulness? A Comment. Heythrop Journal 54 (1):55-69.
Tim Bayne & Greg Restall (2009). A Participatory Model of the Atonement. In Yujin Nagasawa & Erik J. Wielenberg (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan.
Richard Swinburne (1989). Responsibility and Atonement. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
