David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (6):55-85 (1996)
Foucault's theory of disciplinary power and Bourdieu's theory of symbolic power are among the most innovative attempts in recent social thought to come to terms with the increasingly elusive character of power in modern society. Both theories are based on cri tiques of subject-centered analyses of power and offer original accounts of modern social institutions. But Foucault's critique of the subject is so radical that it makes it impossible to identify any deter minate social location of the exercise of power or of resistance to its operations. Bourdieu's theory of practice in terms of the symbolically mediated interaction between the habitus and social structure avoids these problems by connecting relations of domination both to identi fiable social agents and to the institutions of the modern state. However, Bourdieu's strategic model of social action remains too narrow to allow for the possibility of autonomous agency and an emancipatory political praxis. The theory of symbolic power must be supplemented by a normative conception of practical reason if its emancipatory potential is to be realized. Key Words: agency habitus modernity power resistance.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ciaran Cronin (1997). Epistemological Vigilance and the Project of a Sociology of Knowledge. Social Epistemology 11 (2):203 – 215.
Similar books and articles
Henry Krips (1990). Power and Resistance. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (2):170-182.
Kevin Thompson (2003). Forms of Resistance: Foucault on Tactical Reversal and Self-Formation. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 36 (2):113-138.
Andrew Garnar (2006). Power, Action, Signs: Between Peirce and Foucault. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (3):347-366.
Anthony King (2000). Thinking with Bourdieu Against Bourdieu: A 'Practical' Critique of the Habitus. Sociological Theory 18 (3):417-433.
Caroline Ramazanoglu (ed.) (1993). Up Against Foucault: Explorations of Some Tensions Between Foucault and Feminism. Routledge.
Jason A. Springs (2009). "Dismantling the Master's House": Freedom as Ethical Practice in Brandom and Foucault. Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (3):419-448.
Judith Butler (1997). The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford University Press.
Frederick M. Dolan (2005). The Paradoxical Liberty of Bio-Power: Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault on Modern Politics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (3):369-380.
Colin Koopman (2010). Revising Foucault: The History and Critique of Modernity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (5):545-565.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads180 ( #19,073 of 1,797,096 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #168,042 of 1,797,096 )
How can I increase my downloads?