David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (3):271-295 (2011)
Duns Scotus (c. 1266-1308) has long ranked as one of the most challenging of philosophers. He was known from shortly after his death as doctor subtilis—the subtle doctor—and his obscure style and complex thought-processes make him a hard thinker to study. That said, he quickly established an almost cult following among his students, and his thought, for all its density, remained hugely popular throughout the Middle Ages and beyond. It is no exaggeration to claim that the last two decades have seen a remarkable burgeoning of Duns Scotus studies—perhaps not one of medieval proportions, but certainly noticeable. There are various reasons for this, some obvious, some not so obvious, and I will begin by considering ..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard Cross (1999). Duns Scotus. Oxford University Press.
Charles Reginald Schiller Harris (1927). Duns Scotus. Oxford, the Clarendon Press.
Tobias Hoffmann (2010). Duns Scotus’s Action Theory in the Context of His Angelology. In Ludger Honnefelder (ed.), Johannes Duns Scotus 1308–2008: Die philosophischen Perspektiven seines Werkes / Investigations into his Philosophy. Proceedings of “The Quadruple Congress” on John Duns Scotus, part 3. Franciscan Institute Publications; Aschendorff.
Ludger Honnefelder (ed.) (2010). Johannes Duns Scotus 1308–2008: Die Philosophischen Perspektiven Seines Werkes / Investigations Into His Philosophy. Proceedings of “The Quadruple Congress” on John Duns Scotus, Part 3. [REVIEW] Franciscan Institute Publications; Aschendorff.
Thomas Williams (ed.) (2003). The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus. Cambridge University Press.
Richard Cross (2010). Recent Work on the Philosophy of Duns Scotus. Philosophy Compass 5 (8):667-675.
Calvin G. Normore (2003). Duns Scotus' Modal Theory. In Thomas Williams (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus. Cambridge Up. 129-160.
John Duns Scotus (2001). John Duns Scotus' Political and Economic Philosophy. Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure University.
Richard Cross (1998). The Physics of Duns Scotus: The Scientific Context of a Theological Vision. Clarendon Press.
Tobias Hoffmann (1999). The Distinction Between Nature and Will in Duns Scotus. Archives D’Histoire Doctrinale Et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 66:189-224.
John Duns Scotus (1949). The De Primo Principio of John Duns Scotus. St. Bonaventure, N.Y.,Franciscan Institute.
Garrett Smith (2010). Bibliotheca Manuscripta Petri Thomae. Bulletin de Philosophie Medievale 52:161-200.
Added to index2011-07-10
Total downloads56 ( #27,606 of 1,100,793 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #176,465 of 1,100,793 )
How can I increase my downloads?