How to address the ethics of reproductive travel to developing countries: A comparison of national self-sufficiency and regulated market approaches
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Developing World Bioethics 12 (1):45-54 (2012)
One of the areas of concern raised by cross-border reproductive travel regards the treatment of women who are solicited to provide their ova or surrogacy services to foreign consumers. This is particularly troublesome in the context of developing countries where endemic poverty and low standards for both medical care and informed consent may place these women at risk of exploitation and harm. We explore two contrasting proposals for policy development regarding the industry, both of which seek to promote ethical outcomes and social justice: While one proposal advocates efforts to minimize cross-border demand for female reproductive resources through the pursuit of national self-sufficiency, the other defends cross-border trade as a means for meeting the needs of vulnerable groups. Despite the conflicting objectives of the proposed strategies, the paper identifies common values and points of agreement between the two, including the importance of regulations to safeguard those providing ova or surrogacy services
|Keywords||commercial surrogacy oocyte donation medical tourism assisted reproductive technologies justice health care|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Elise Smith, Jason Behrmann, Carolina Martin & Bryn Williams-jones (2010). Reproductive Tourism in Argentina: Clinic Accreditation and its Implications for Consumers, Health Professionals and Policy Makers. Developing World Bioethics 10 (2):59-69.
Vida Panitch (2013). Surrogate Tourism and Reproductive Rights. Hypatia 28 (2):274-289.
Daniel Callahan (2006). Medicine and the Market: Equity V. Choice. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Casey Humbyrd (2009). Fair Trade International Surrogacy. Developing World Bioethics 9 (3):111-118.
Emily A. Mok, Lawrence O. Gostin, Monica Das Gupta & Max Levin (2010). Implementing Public Health Regulations in Developing Countries: Lessons From the OECD Countries. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):508-519.
Anne Donchin (2010). Reproductive Tourism and the Quest for Global Gender Justice. Bioethics 24 (7):323-332.
J. Snyder, V. A. Crooks & R. Johnston (2012). Perceptions of the Ethics of Medical Tourism: Comparing Patient and Academic Perspectives. Public Health Ethics 5 (1):38-46.
Ingo Pies & Stefan Hielscher (2011). The International Provision of Pharmaceuticals: A Comparison of Two Alternative Argumentative Strategies for Global Ethics. Journal of Global Ethics 7 (1):73 - 89.
Sirine Shebaya, Andrea Sutherland, Orin Levine & Ruth Faden (2010). Alternatives to National Average Income Data as Eligibility Criteria for International Subsidies: A Social Justice Perspective. Developing World Bioethics 10 (3):141-149.
Peter F. Omonzejele (2010). Global Principles, Local Obligations: Reproductive Ethics in Affluent Societies and Developing Countries. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (1):32-47.
Susan Dodds (2008). Inclusion and Exclusion in Women's Access to Health and Medicine. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):58 - 79.
Min Liu & Qingli Hu (2014). A Proposed Approach to Informed Consent for Biobanks in China. Bioethics 28 (4):181-186.
Meri Koivusalo (2010). Common Health Policy Interests and the Shaping of Global Pharmaceutical Policies. Ethics and International Affairs 24 (4):395-414.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-17
Total downloads1 ( #306,343 of 1,089,155 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,735 of 1,089,155 )
How can I increase my downloads?