How Theory Matters: Formative Assessment Theory and Practices and Their Different Relations to Education [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (3):251-263 (2012)
|Abstract||The positioning of theory in relation to educational practice has provoked much recent debate, with some arguing that educational theory constrains thinking in education, while others dismiss ‘theory’ out of hand as belonging to the world of the ‘academic’, abstracted from the ‘realities’ of the classroom. This paper views theory as necessarily implicated in all practices, but argues that depending on the theories embraced, and the understanding of theory itself, education can be understood in very different ways. Resisting the separation of theory from practice, the paper takes up the call to consider the entanglement of theory with practice, or how theory matters. It takes formative assessment as a particularly fertile case for this discussion. Formative assessment has been considerably developed in schooling across different national education systems. Its aspiration is for assessment to support learning, rather than only to credentialise learning. Having first emerged as a concept when behaviourism held sway, it has been considered through different theoretical lenses. Drawing upon empirical studies of classroom assessment practices, the paper draws out the different ‘mattering’ implicated in the different languages of assessment used by practitioners, raising questions about the practices this produced. The paper concludes by asking if formative assessment could become ‘educational’ in a more radical sense, if opportunities to focus on the contingencies and politics of our meaning-making were sometimes taken up more openly and dialogically with students, as opposed to formative assessment sitting in a instrumental relationship to a given curriculum|
|Keywords||Education and theory Formative assessment theory Education and politics Theory as performative|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Maddalena Taras (2005). Assessment: Summative and Formative: Some Theoretical Reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (4):466 - 478.
John Threlfall (2005). The Formative Use of Assessment Information in Planning: The Notion of Contingent Planning. British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (1):54 - 65.
Peter A. D. Beets (2012). Strengthening Morality and Ethics in Educational Assessment Through Ubuntu in South Africa. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (s2):68-83.
L. E. E. George (forthcoming). Systemic Colonization of the Educational Lifeworld: An Example in Literacy Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory.
Nick Peim & Kevin J. Flint (2009). Testing Times: Questions Concerning Assessment for School Improvement. Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (3):342-361.
Richard Edwards (2011). Theory Matters: Representation and Experimentation in Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (5):522-534.
Gordon Stobart (2001). The Validity of National Curriculum Assessment. British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (1):26 - 39.
Leo Fernig & James Bowen (eds.) (1979/1980). Twenty-Five Years of Educational Practice and Theory, 1955-1979: International Review of Education Jubilee Volume. M. Nijhoff.
Thomas A. Romer (2003). Learning and Assessment in Postmodern Education. Educational Theory 53 (3):313-327.
Brian J. Richards (2008). Formative Assessment in Teacher Education: The Development of a Diagnostic Language Test for Trainee Teachers of German. British Journal of Educational Studies 56 (2):184 - 204.
Paul O'Leary (1994). A Critical Review of Allen Pearson,The Teacher: Theory and Practice in Teacher Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 13 (2):157-162.
Raf Vanderstraeten & Gert Biesta (2006). How Is Education Possible? Pragmatism, Communication and the Social Organisation of Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 54 (2):160 - 174.
John L. Childs (1958). An Assessment of the Experimentalist Educational Theory. Columbus, College of Education, Ohio State University.
Franz Huber (2007). The Logic of Theory Assessment. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (5):511-538.
Added to index2012-03-27
Total downloads12 ( #101,187 of 739,305 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,030 of 739,305 )
How can I increase my downloads?