Graduate studies at Western
Linguistics and Philosophy 8 (3):353-357 (1985)
|Abstract||I show that given Jonathan Bennett's theory of 'even if,' the following statement is logically true iff the principle of conditional excluded is valid: (SE) If Q and if P wouldn't rule out Q, then Q even if P. Hence whatever intuitions support the validity of (SE) support the validity of Conditional Excluded Middle, too. Finally I show that Bennett's objection to John Bigelow's theory of the conditional can be turned into a (perhaps) more telling one, viz. that on Bigelow's theory 'if P then Q' and 'if P and Q then R' do not jointly entail 'if P then R'.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
George Bennett (2008). Foreword to New Edition. In John G. Bennett (ed.), Idiots in Paris: Diaries of J.G. Bennett and Elizabeth Bennett, 1949. Bennett Books.
Charles B. Cross (2009). Conditional Excluded Middle. Erkenntnis 70 (2):173-188.
John G. Bennett (2008/1991). Idiots in Paris: Diaries of J.G. Bennett and Elizabeth Bennett, 1949. Bennett Books.
Nicholas Unwin (1996). The Individuation of Events. Mind 105 (418):315-330.
Lee Walters (2009). Morgenbesser's Coin and Counterfactuals with True Components. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt3):365-379.
Jonathan Francis Bennett (1974). Kant's Dialectic. New York]Cambridge University Press.
Jonathan Bennett (2003). A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals. Oxford University Press.
Arthur W. Collins & Daniel C. Bennett (1966). Jonathan Bennett on Rationality: Two Reviews. Journal of Philosophy 63 (May):253-266.
J. Robert G. Williams (2010). Defending Conditional Excluded Middle. Noûs 44 (4):650-668.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,923 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?