David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):593-595 (2012)
Progress in transplantation outcomes depends on continuing research into both donor and recipient factors that may enhance graft and patient survival. A system of licencing for transplantation research, introduced by the Human Tissue Act 2004, which separates it from the transplantation process (then exempt from licencing), has damaged this vital activity by a combination of inflexible interpretation of the 2004 Act and fear of criminal liability on the part of researchers. Now, following the European Union (EU) Directive (2010) on standards of quality and safety of human organs intended for transplantation, new UK Regulations have been drafted, which are intended to implement it. These Regulations impose a compulsory licencing system, similar to that for research, on the whole transplantation process. This goes beyond what is required by the Directive and may even have an inhibitory effect similar to that already seen in research. Initial draft Regulations went further, imposing criminal sanctions for breaches. However, following a public consultation process, the Department of Health (DH) has recently stated that, as a result of the overwhelming view of respondents that the proposed licencing system was unnecessary, all sanctions under the final Regulations are now decriminalised, with the sole exception of operating without a licence. While this does not eliminate the negative effect of licencing, it does suggest an awareness of the DH that excessive regulation unnecessarily harms the transplantation process. An opportunity thus arises for the Human Tissue Authority (the regulatory body for both the new licences and research licences under the 2004 Act) to end the current illogical and harmful separation of transplantation and transplantation research by ensuring that all centres licenced for organ donation, retrieval and transplantation are also fully licenced for related research
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sarah B. Rodriguez & Lisa Campo-Engelstein (2011). Conceiving Wholeness Women, Motherhood, and Ovarian Transplantation, 1902 and 2004. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 54 (3):409-416.
Clifford Earle Bartz (2003). Operation Blue, ULTRA: DION--The Donation Inmate Organ Network. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (1):37-43.
Mark T. Nelson (1991). The Morality of a Free Market for Transplant Organs. Public Affairs Quarterly 5 (1):63-79.
A. J. Cronin, M. L. Rose, J. H. Dark & J. F. Douglas (2011). British Transplant Research Endangered by the Human Tissue Act. Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (8):512-514.
J. F. Douglas, M. L. Rose, J. H. Dark & A. J. Cronin (2011). Transplant Research and Deceased Donors: Laws, Licences and Fear of Liability. Clinical Ethics 6 (3):140-145.
Jeff McMahan (2007). Justice and Liability in Organ Allocation. Social Research: An International Quarterly 74 (1):101-124.
D. P. Price (1997). Organ Transplant Initiatives: The Twilight Zone. Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (3):170-175.
Atsushi Asai, Yasuhiro Kadooka & Kuniko Aizawa (2012). Arguments Against Promoting Organ Transplants From Brain-Dead Donors, and Views of Contemporary Japanese on Life and Death. Bioethics 26 (4):215-223.
S. Fovargue & J. Miola (2011). The European Union Directive on Organ Donation and Transplantation. Clinical Ethics 6 (3):117-121.
Ann Mongoven (2003). Sharing Our Body and Blood: Organ Donation and Feminist Critiques of Sacrifice. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (1):89 – 114.
Ronald Y. Nakasone (2006). Ethics of Ambiguity : A Buddhist Reflection on the Japanese Organ Transplant Law. In David E. Guinn (ed.), Handbook of Bioethics and Religion. Oxford University Press
Andrew Millis, Matthew Devitt & Mary Simmerling, Assessing Moral Arguments Against Living Organ Donation by Prisoners.
Helen Hardacre (1994). Response of Buddhism and Shintō to the Issue of Brain Death and Organ Transplant. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (4):585.
Anne Moates (2006). Emerging Transplantation Ethics. Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 12 (1):7.
Added to index2012-08-09
Total downloads5 ( #543,332 of 1,938,522 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #288,361 of 1,938,522 )
How can I increase my downloads?