Opportunities and responsibilities
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The use of computers in education is often thought of as a means of putting sound pedagogical principles and techniques into practice. However, such use can also contribute to building the empirical foundations for those techniques. This can occur in two ways. First, CAI programs can collect data on student performance for the purpose of identifying prominent weaknesses and for investigating processes involved in mastering various tasks and learning particular subject matters. In every discipline, from the sciences to the humanities, there are important questions to be answered concerning the difficulties students have in learning and applying various concepts and techniques. CAI can aid in answering those questions. Second, CAI programs can be used to document student performance for the purpose of program evaluation. While providing instruction, computers can serve as data collection devices that provide precise behavioral measures, including response time, of student learning. CAI programs can thus facilitate their own evaluation. In both of these applications, computers function akin to other observational instruments in the sciences.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Kohls (1996). Student Experiences with Service Learning in a Business Ethics Course. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (1):45 - 57.
Donald Crumbley, Ronald Flinn & Kenneth Reichelt (2010). What is Ethical About Grade Inflation and Coursework Deflation? Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):187-197.
Ganesh Baliga, John Case, Sanjay Jain & Mandayam Suraj (1994). Machine Learning of Higher-Order Programs. Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (2):486-500.
Kenneth J. Reichelt (2010). What is Ethical About Grade Inflation and Coursework Deflation? Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):187-197.
Ross P. Cameron (2012). Composition as Identity Doesn't Settle the Special Composition Question1. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (3):531-554.
Gloria Dall'Alba (2009). Learning Professional Ways of Being: Ambiguities of Becoming. Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (1):34-45.
Joseph Henrich (2001). Challenges for Everyone: Real People, Deception, One-Shot Games, Social Learning, and Computers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):414-415.
Michael S. Pritchard (2000). Service-Learning and Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):413-422.
Joseph R. Herkert (1997). Collaborative Learning in Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (4):447-462.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #744,999 of 1,789,998 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?