Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Theology 12 (1):131-154 (2000)
|Abstract||Karl Rahner’s “world church” turns out to be a church of significant theological and cultural pluralism in which doctrine can sometimes strain to unify disparate elements. This article examines this problem in light of Rahner’s theory of doctrinal development. First, it examines the notion of doctrine itself, suggesting a pliable model inspired by usages of “dogma” in the early church which reflect both teaching and confession of faith. Second, Rahner’s theory of doctrinal development is discussed in light of Newman’s theory. Rahner’s theory shares Newman’s emphasis on “mind” or “faith consciousness.” Although both attend to the historical mediations of revelation, the truth of doctrine remains at an ideational level, an expression of abstract truth. William Lynch’s notion of the imagination of faith and dogma as a poetic embodiment of truth offers an alternative model that accommodates fundamental insights of both Rahner and Newman. Finally, this article discusses how we can find a foundation for coherence amidst a pluralism of interpretations. The ancient regula fidei is invoked. Here, Rahner’s suggestion of short creedal formulae provides a possible modern equivalent. It is also itself an example of doctrinal development appropriate for situations within the world church in which Catholics now find themselves|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Richard Lennan (2000). Rahner's Theology of the Priesthood and the Development of Doctrine. Philosophy and Theology 12 (1):155-185.
Mary E. Hines (2000). Rahner on Development of Doctrine. Philosophy and Theology 12 (1):111-130.
Richard Lennan (2005). Faith in Context: Rahner on the Possibility of Belief. Philosophy and Theology 17 (1/2):233-258.
Peter C. Phan (1995). Is Karl Rahner's Doctrine of Sin Orthodox? Philosophy and Theology 9 (1/2):223-236.
Timothy P. Muldoon (1997). Germain Grisez on Karl Rahner's Theory of Fundamental Option. Philosophy and Theology 10 (1):227-254.
Richard Penaskovic (2011). A Prophetic Voice. Philosophy and Theology 23 (2):283-300.
William A. Clark (2001). The Authority of Local Church Communities. Philosophy and Theology 13 (2):399-424.
Lambert J. Leijssen (1995). Rahner's Contribution to the Renewal of Sacramentology. Philosophy and Theology 9 (1/2):201-222.
Karl Rahner (2006). Faith. Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):393-399.
John F. Perry (2001). Ripalda and Rahner. Philosophy and Theology 13 (2):339-361.
Heinrich Fries (2004). Theological Method According to John Henry Newman and Karl Rahner. Philosophy and Theology 16 (1):163-193.
Terrence W. Tilley (2005). What Kind of Faith is Possible in Our Contexts? Philosophy and Theology 17 (1-2):259-277.
Geffrey B. Kelly (1995). “Unconscious Christianity” And The “Anonymous Christian” in The Theology of Dietrich Bonhoeffer And Karl Rahner. Philosophy and Theology 9 (1/2):117-149.
Thomas G. Guarino (1993). Rahner, Popper and Kuhn. Philosophy and Theology 8 (1):83-89.
Nicholas Adams (2000). The Present Made Future. Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):191-211.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads1 ( #292,081 of 739,303 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,303 )
How can I increase my downloads?