Slurs

Language Sciences 33:343-358 (2011)
Abstract
Slurs possess interesting linguistic properties and so have recently attracted the attention of linguists and philosophers of language. For instance the racial slur "nigger" is explosively derogatory, enough so that just hearing it mentioned can leave one feeling as if they have been made complicit in a morally atrocious act. (Jennifer Hornsby has suggested that slurs might count as “hate speech” and so raise questions “about the compatibility of the regulation of [hate] speech with principles of free speech” (2001, p. 129). Indeed, the very taboo nature of these words makes discussion of them typically prohibited or frowned upon. Although it is true that the utterance of slurs is illegitimate and derogatory in most contexts, sufficient evidence suggests that slurs are not always or exclusively used to derogate. In fact, slurs are frequently picked up and appropriated by the very in-group members that the slur was originally intended to target. This might be done, for instance, as a means for like speakers to strengthen in-group solidarity. So an investigation into the meaning and use of slurs can give us crucial insight into how words can be used with such derogatory impact, and how they can be turned around and appropriated as vehicles of rapport in certain contexts among in-group speakers. In this essay I will argue that slurs are best characterized as being of a mixed descriptive/expressive type. Next, I will review the most influential accounts of slurs offered thus far, explain their shortcomings, then provide a new analysis of slurs and explain in what ways it is superior to others. Finally, I suggest that a family-resemblance conception of category membership can help us achieve a clearer understanding of the various ways in which slurs, for better or worse, are actually put to use in natural language discourse.
Keywords slurs  euphemisms  philosophy of language  epithets  taboo  derogation  semantics  pragmatics  politeness  family resemblance
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Elisabeth Camp (2013). Slurring Perspectives. Analytic Philosophy 54 (3):330-349.
    Robin Jeshion (2013). Slurs and Stereotypes. Analytic Philosophy 54 (3):314-329.
    Similar books and articles
    Christopher Hom (2010). Pejoratives. Philosophy Compass 5 (2):164-185.
    Lynne Tirrell (2012). Genocidal Language Games. In Ishani Maitra & Mary Kate McGowan (eds.), Speech and Harm: Controversies Over Free Speech. Oxford University Press. 174--221.
    Mark Richard (2011). Reply to Lynch, Miščević, and Stojanović. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):197-208.
    Christopher Hom (2012). A Puzzle About Pejoratives. Philosophical Studies 159 (3):383-405.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-12-18

    Total downloads

    66 ( #18,338 of 1,088,818 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    21 ( #5,092 of 1,088,818 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.