Skeptical Success
Oxford Studies in Epistemology 3:35-62 (2010)
| Abstract | The following is not a successful skeptical scenario: you think you know you have hands, but maybe you don't! Why is that a failure, when it's far more likely than, say, the evil genius hypothesis? That's the question.<br><br>This is an earlier draft. | |||||||||
| Keywords | contextualism knowledge skepticism luminosity nozick subjunctive conditionals sensitivity DeRose | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
  |
| External links |
 Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJonathan Ichikawa (2011). Quantifiers and Epistemic Contextualism. Philosophical Studies 155 (3):383-398.
Bryan Frances (2005). When a Skeptical Hypothesis is Live. Noûs 39 (4):559–595.
Federico Luzzi (2011). Contextualism and Counter-Closure. Dialectica 66 (1):187-199.
Kelly Becker (2009). Margins for Error and Sensitivity: What Nozick Might Have Said. Acta Analytica 24 (1):17-31.
Theodore J. Everett (2006). Antiskeptical Conditionals. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3):505–536.
John Greco (2007). External World Skepticism. Philosophy Compass 2 (4):625–649.
Adam Leite (2004). Skepticism, Sensitivity, and Closure. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):335-350.
Jay Newhard (2012). The Argument From Skepticism for Contextualism. Philosophia 40 (3):563-575.
Bruce Russell (2005). Contextualism on a Pragmatic, Not a Skeptical, Footing. Acta Analytica 20 (2):26-37.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-02-15Total downloads358 ( #258 of 549,070 )Recent downloads (6 months)47 ( #592 of 549,070 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
