Oxford Studies in Epistemology 3:35-62 (2010)
|Abstract||The following is not a successful skeptical scenario: you think you know you have hands, but maybe you don't! Why is that a failure, when it's far more likely than, say, the evil genius hypothesis? That's the question.<br><br>This is an earlier draft.|
|Keywords||contextualism knowledge skepticism luminosity nozick subjunctive conditionals sensitivity DeRose|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jonathan Ichikawa (2011). Quantifiers and Epistemic Contextualism. Philosophical Studies 155 (3):383-398.
Bryan Frances (2005). When a Skeptical Hypothesis is Live. Noûs 39 (4):559–595.
Federico Luzzi (2011). Contextualism and Counter-Closure. Dialectica 66 (1):187-199.
Kelly Becker (2009). Margins for Error and Sensitivity: What Nozick Might Have Said. Acta Analytica 24 (1):17-31.
Theodore J. Everett (2006). Antiskeptical Conditionals. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3):505–536.
John Greco (2007). External World Skepticism. Philosophy Compass 2 (4):625–649.
Adam Leite, Skepticism, Sensitivity, and Closure, or Why the Closure Principle is Irrelevant to External World Skepticism.
Adam Leite (2004). Skepticism, Sensitivity, and Closure. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):335-350.
Jay Newhard (2012). The Argument From Skepticism for Contextualism. Philosophia 40 (3):563-575.
Bruce Russell (2005). Contextualism on a Pragmatic, Not a Skeptical, Footing. Acta Analytica 20 (2):26-37.
Added to index2010-02-15
Total downloads358 ( #258 of 549,070 )
Recent downloads (6 months)47 ( #592 of 549,070 )
How can I increase my downloads?