David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Political Theory 35 (2):121 - 146 (2007)
Is the liberal state entitled to intervene in the internal affairs of its nonliberal minorities to promote individual autonomy as a public ideal, or should it tolerate the nonliberal practices of such groups in the name of legitimate diversity? This problem can be fruitfully approached from the perspective of Isaiah Berlin's notion of "value pluralism." According to William Galston, value pluralism privileges a form of liberalism that is maximally accommodating of nonliberal groups and their practices. I agree that pluralism fits best with a liberal political framework, but I depart from Galston's interpretation of what liberal pluralism involves. Taking value pluralism seriously, I argue, implies a form of liberalism in which personal autonomy is a central public ideal.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
George Crowder (2015). Value Pluralism, Diversity and Liberalism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):549-564.
Jaakko Kuosmanen (2010). Diversity in Value Pluralism. SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 11 (1):90-106.
Similar books and articles
John Gray (1998). Where Pluralists and Liberals Part Company. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (1):17 – 36.
Carmen Pavel (2004). William A. Galston, Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice:Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice. Ethics 114 (3):615-618.
James Bohman (2003). Reflexive Public Deliberation: Democracy and the Limits of Pluralism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (1):85-105.
Maria Baghramian & Attracta Ingram (eds.) (2000). Pluralism: The Philosophy and Politics of Diversity. Routledge.
Carlo Argenton & Enzo Rossi (2013). Pluralism, Preferences, and Deliberation: A Critique of Sen's Constructive Argument for Democracy. Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (2):129-145.
William Galston (2011). Moral Pluralism and Liberal Democracy : Isaiah Berlin's Heterodox Liberalism. In Catherine H. Zuckert (ed.), Political Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: Authors and Arguments. Cambridge University Press
Neil Burtonwood (2006). Cultural Diversity, Liberal Pluralism and Schools: Isaiah Berlin and Education. Routledge.
Neil Burtonwood (2000). Must Liberal Support for Separate Schools Be Subject to a Condition of Individual Autonomy? British Journal of Educational Studies 48 (3):269-284.
Robert B. Talisse (2011). Value Pluralism and Liberal Politics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):87-100.
Craig L. Carr (2010). Liberalism and Pluralism: The Politics of E Pluribus Unum. Palgrave Macmillan.
Helder de Schutter (2007). Nations Beyond Nationalism. Inquiry 50 (4):378 – 394.
Chidella Upendra (2009). In Defense of Liberal-Pluralism. Cambridge Scholars Pub..
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads19 ( #206,669 of 1,934,791 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,672 of 1,934,791 )
How can I increase my downloads?