David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):187-205 (2003)
As soon as we attend to the subject, either by asking questions or by making statements about it, we ipso facto make the subject the object of our attention. The question then is whether we can get behind the subject as object and attain the subject as subject. Is the project not self-refuting? For an answer I invoke the parallel case of insight into insight. We cannot imagine the act of insight and so cannot understand it directly, but we can construct symbols of insight, understand them, and thus indirectly achieve some understanding of it. Lonergan made five attempts to achieve insight into insight; the article examines them one by one and applies them to our parallel case in order to conclude that there is a meaningful sense in which we may attain and speak of the subject as subject
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Eric James Morelli (2011). Insight and the Subject. International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (2):137-148.
Giovanni B. Sala (1997). Bernard Lonergan's Method in Theology. Philosophy and Theology 10 (2):469-499.
Susan Hekman (1991). Reconstituting the Subject: Feminism, Modernism, and Postmodernism. Hypatia 6 (2):44 - 63.
Gerard Kuperus (2010). The Development of the Role of the Spectator in Kant's Thinking. Idealistic Studies 40 (1/2):65-82.
Bernard J. F. Lonergan (1968). The Subject. Milwaukee, Marquette University Press.
Dorothea Debus (2013). Thinking About the Past and Experiencing the Past. Mind and Language 28 (1):20-54.
Ed Pluth (2006). Lacan's Subversion of the Subject. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3):293-312.
Jonathan Schaffer (2006). The Irrelevance of the Subject: Against Subject-Sensitive Invariantism. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 127 (1):87-107.
F. Sauri (1998). Bradley's Supposed Rejection of Subject-Predicate Judgements. Bradley Studies 4 (1):102-112.
Yan Yin (2008). 论个体自我认同危机. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 36:293-297.
Galen Strawson (2003). What is the Relation Between an Experience, the Subject of the Experience, and the Content of the Experience? Philosophical Issues 13 (1):279-315.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads14 ( #133,766 of 1,692,617 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #75,733 of 1,692,617 )
How can I increase my downloads?