Uncommon Sense: The Heretical Nature of Science
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (1993)
Most people believe that science arose as a natural end-product of our innate intelligence and curiosity, as an inevitable stage in human intellectual development. But physicist and educator Alan Cromer disputes this belief. Cromer argues that science is not the natural unfolding of human potential, but the invention of a particular culture, Greece, in a particular historical period. Indeed, far from being natural, scientific thinking goes so far against the grain of conventional human thought that if it hadn't been discovered in Greece, it might not have been discovered at all. In Uncommon Sense, Alan Cromer develops the argument that science represents a radically new and different way of thinking. Using Piaget's stages of intellectual development, he shows that conventional thinking remains mired in subjective, "egocentric" ways of looking at the world--most people even today still believe in astrology, ESP, UFOs, ghosts and other paranormal phenomena--a mode of thought that science has outgrown. He provides a fascinating explanation of why science began in Greece, contrasting the Greek practice of debate to the Judaic reliance on prophets for acquiring knowledge. Other factors, such as a maritime economy and wandering scholars (both of which prevented parochialism) and an essentially literary religion not dominated by priests, also promoted in Greece an objective, analytical way of thinking not found elsewhere in the ancient world. He examines India and China and explains why science could not develop in either country. In China, for instance, astronomy served only the state, and the private study of astronomy was forbidden. Cromer also provides a perceptive account of science in Renaissance Europe and of figures such as Copernicus, Galileo, and Newton. Along the way, Cromer touches on many intriguing topics, arguing, for instance, that much of science is essential complete; there are no new elements yet to be discovered. He debunks the vaunted SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) project, which costs taxpayers millions each year, showing that physical limits--such as the melting point of metal--put an absolute limit on the speed of space travel, making trips to even the nearest star all but impossible. Finally, Cromer discusses the deplorable state of science education in America and suggests several provocative innovations to improve high school education, including a radical proposal to give all students an intensive eighth and ninth year program, eliminating the last two years of high school. Uncommon Sense is an illuminating look at science, filled with provocative observations. Whether challenging Thomas Kuhn's theory of scientific revolutions, or extolling the virtues of Euclid's Elements, Alan Cromer is always insightful, outspoken, and refreshingly original.
|Keywords||Science Philosophy Science History Thought and thinking|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$21.52 used (22% off) $29.22 new Amazon page|
|Call number||Q175.C897 1993|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Viola Schiaffonati & Mario Verdicchio (2014). Computing and Experiments. Philosophy and Technology 27 (3):359-376.
Sawa Senzaki, Takahiko Masuda & Keiko Ishii (2014). When Is Perception Top-Down and When Is It Not? Culture, Narrative, and Attention. Cognitive Science 38 (7):1493-1506.
Hillard S. Kaplan, Jane B. Lancaster, Sara E. Johnson & John A. Bock (1995). Does Observed Fertility Maximize Fitness Among New Mexican Men? Human Nature 6 (4):325-360.
Alberto Artosi (2010). Please Don't Use Science or Mathematics in Arguing for Human Rights or Natural Law. Ratio Juris 23 (3):311-332.
Jeffrey P. Schloss & Michael J. Murray (2009). You Can't Always Get What You Want: Evolution and True Beliefs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):533-534.
Similar books and articles
John Losee (1987). Philosophy of Science and Historical Enquiry. Oxford University Press.
Peter Dear (2006). The Intelligibility of Nature: How Science Makes Sense of the World. University of Chicago Press.
Samir Okasha (2002). Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Keith M. Parsons (2005). Copernican Questions: A Concise Invitation to the Philosophy of Science. Mcgraw-Hill.
Michael R. Matthews (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
F. Rochberg (2002). A Consideration of Babylonian Astronomy Within the Historiography of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (4):661-684.
Steven G. Darian (2003). Understanding the Language of Science. University of Texas Press.
Alan H. Cromer (1997). Connected Knowledge: Science, Philosophy, and Education. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?