Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 24 (3):223 - 244 (2000)
|Abstract||This study investigates professional tax practitioners' ethical judgments and behavioral intentions in cases involving client pressure to adopt aggressive reporting positions, an issue that has been identified as the most difficult ethical/moral problem facing public accounting practitioners. The multidimensional ethics scale (MES) was used to measure the extent to which a hypothetical behavior was consistent with five ethical philosophies (moral equity, contractualism, utilitarianism, relativism, and egoism). Responses from a sample of 67 tax professionals supported the existence of all dimensions of the MES other than egoism. Regressions of ethical judgments and behavioral intentions on the MES dimensions indicate that ethical decision making is most heavily influenced by the moral equity dimension, followed by the contractualism dimension. In contrast, the utilitarianism and relativism dimensions were only related to ethical judgments and behavioral intentions in isolated instances.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rex L. Marshall, Robert W. Armstrong & Malcolm Smith (1998). The Ethical Environment of Tax Practitioners: Western Australian Evidence. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (12):1265-1279.
Lin Ge & Stuart Thomas (2008). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Deliberative Reasoning of Canadian and Chinese Accounting Students. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):189 - 211.
Tara J. Shawver & John T. Sennetti (2009). Measuring Ethical Sensitivity and Evaluation. Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):663 - 678.
Sean R. Valentine & Terri L. Rittenburg (2004). Spanish and American Business Professionals' Ethical Evaluations in Global Situations. Journal of Business Ethics 51 (1):1-14.
Elaine M. Doyle, Jane Frecknall Hughes & Keith W. Glaister (2009). Linking Ethics and Risk Management in Taxation: Evidence From an Exploratory Study in Ireland and the Uk. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 86 (2):177 - 198.
Tim Barnett & Cheryl Vaicys (2000). The Moderating Effect of Individuals' Perceptions of Ethical Work Climate on Ethical Judgments and Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (4):351 - 362.
Scott A. Yetmar & Kenneth K. Eastman (2000). Tax Practitioners' Ethical Sensitivity: A Model and Empirical Examination. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 26 (4):271 - 288.
D. Bobek Donna, M. Hageman Amy & R. Radtke Robin (2010). The Ethical Environment of Tax Professionals: Partner and Non-Partner Perceptions and Experiences. Journal of Business Ethics 92 (4).
Gene Brown (1999). Individual Difference Variables, Ethical Judgments, and Ethical Behavioral Intentions. Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (2):183-206.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,434 of 722,951 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?