Philosophical Psychology 25 (2):279 - 294 (2011)
|Abstract||High-level theory is the view that high-level properties?the property of being a dog, being a tiger, being an apple, being a pair of lips, etc.?can be represented in perceptual experience. Low-level theory denies this and claims that high-level properties are only represented at the level of perceptual judgment and are products of cognitive interpretation of low-level sensory information (color, shape, illumination). This paper discusses previous attempts to establish high-level theory, their weaknesses, and an argument for high-level theory that does not have these weaknesses|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nicholas Silins (2013). The Significance of High-Level Content. Philosophical Studies 162 (1):13-33.
P. DesAutels (1995). Two Types of Theories: The Impact of Churchland's Perceptual Plasticity. Philosophical Psychology 8 (1):25-33.
Chris Eliasmith, Structure Without Symbols: Providing a Distributed Account of High-Level Cognition.
Tim Bayne (2009). Perception and the Reach of Phenomenal Content. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236):385-404.
David J. Chalmers, Robert M. French & Douglas R. Hofstadter (1992). High-Level Perception, Representation, and Analogy:A Critique of Artificial Intelligence Methodology. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intellige 4 (3):185 - 211.
Frédérique de Vignemont (2009). Drawing the Boundary Between Low-Level and High-Level Mindreading. Philosophical Studies 144 (3).
Frédérique De Vignemont (2009). Review: Drawing the Boundary Between Low-Level and High-Level Mindreading. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 144 (3):457 - 466.
Terence E. Horgan (1984). Supervenience and Cosmic Hermeneutics. Southern Journal of Philosophy Supplement 22 (S1):19-38.
Gary E. Raney (2003). E-Z Reader 7 Provides a Platform for Explaining How Low- and High-Level Linguistic Processes Influence Eye Movements. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):498-499.
William Fish (2013). High-Level Properties and Visual Experience. Philosophical Studies 162 (1):43-55.
Martha J. Farah & G. Ratcliff (eds.) (1994). The Neuropsychology of High-Level Vision. Lawrence Erlbaum.
J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (1985). Levels Indeed! A Response to Broadbent. Journal of Experimental Psychology 114:193-7.
Added to index2010-11-29
Total downloads89 ( #7,900 of 549,093 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,228 of 549,093 )
How can I increase my downloads?