Phronesis 43 (3):264-286 (1998)
|Abstract||In this paper, I argue that Plotinus offers us a new and interesting account of self-intellection. It is an account which is informed to some extent by a dilemma that Sextus Empiricus raised about the intellect being to apprehend itself. The significance of Sextus' dilemma is that it sets out the framework within which such a cognitive activity is to be dealt with, namely the intellect must apprehend itself qua part or qua whole, both of which according to him are impossible. Plotinus, I think, successfully gets around this dilemma and is able to explain how the intellect can think itself qua whole. In the process of doing so, he offers an account of self-intellection in which the thinking subject or thinker becomes active in terms of generating its intellectual content, namely itself; a move which is a break from the traditional Platonic/Aristotelian account of the intellect. The paper itself is set up as follows. I start by mentioning the dilemma which Sextus raises about self-intellection. Then I attempt, through an analysis of the noetic intellect's structure, to show how Plotinus is able to offer an account of self-intellection in terms of whole apprehending whole. I conclude with Plotinus' analysis of the light analogy as a means of explaining how this intellectual process works|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
I. Crystal (1998). Plotinus on the Structure of Self-Intellection. Phronesis 43 (3):264 - 286.
D. M. Hutchinson (2012). Apprehension of Thought in Ennead 4.3.30. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5 (2):262-282.
Marilena Vlad (2007). De l'unité de l'intellect à l'un absolu. Chôra 5:121-139.
Kurt Pritzl (2006). The Place of Intellect in Aristotle. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:57-75.
Robbert van Den Berg (2011). Procheirisis: Porphyry Sent. 16 and Plotinus on the Similes of the Waxen Block and the Aviary. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (2):163-180.
Eyjólfur Kjalar Emilsson (2007). Plotinus on Intellect. Oxford University Press.
Riccardo Chiaradonna (2012). Plotinus' Account of the Cognitive Powers of the Soul: Sense Perception and Discursive Thought. [REVIEW] Topoi 31 (2):191-207.
John Bussanich (2008). Plotinus on Intellect (E.K.) Emilsson Plotinus on Intellect. Pp. Viii + 232. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007. Cased, £35. ISBN: 978-0-19-928170-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 58 (02):439-.
Annamaria Schiaparelli (2009). Plotinus on Dialectic. Archiv für Geschichte Der Philosophie 91 (3):253-287.
Filip Karfík (2012). L'âme logos de l'intellect et le logismos de l'âme. À propos des Ennéades V, 1  et IV, 3 . Chôra 9:67-80.
Suzanne Stern-Gillet (2000). Le Principe Du Beau Chez Plotin: Réflexions sur "Enneas" VI.7.32 et 33. Phronesis 45 (1):38 - 63.
Suzanne Stern-Gillet (2000). Le Principe Du Beau Chez Plotin: Réflexions sur Enneas VI.7.32 et 33. Phronesis 45 (1):38-63.
Lloyd P. Gerson (1994). Self-Intellection and Identity in the Philosophy of Plotinus. Ancient Philosophy 14 (1):231-234.
Eric D. Perl (2009). The Good of the Intellect. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:25-39.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads9 ( #122,367 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?