David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind and Language 25 (2):141-168 (2010)
I make three related proposals concerning the development of receptive communication in human infants. First, I propose that the presence of communicative intentions can be recognized in others' behaviour before the content of these intentions is accessed or inferred. Second, I claim that such recognition can be achieved by decoding specialized ostensive signals. Third, I argue on empirical bases that, by decoding ostensive signals, human infants are capable of recognizing communicative intentions addressed to them. Thus, learning about actual modes of communication benefits from, and is guided by, infants' preparedness to detect infant-directed ostensive communication.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Richard Breheny (2006). Communication and Folk Psychology. Mind and Language 21 (1):74-107.
George Butterworth (2004). Joint Visual Attention in Infancy. In Gavin Bremner & Alan Slater (eds.), Theories of Infant Development. Blackwell. 317--354.
Susan Carey (2009). The Origin of Concepts. Oxford University Press.
Gergely Csibra & György Gergely (2009). Natural Pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (4):148-153.
Teresa Farroni, Stefano Massaccesi, Enrica Menon & Mark H. Johnson (2007). Direct Gaze Modulates Face Recognition in Young Infants. Cognition 102 (3):396-404.
Citations of this work BETA
Anika Fiebich & Shaun Gallagher (2012). Joint Attention in Joint Action. Philosophical Psychology 26 (4):571-87.
Shannon Spaulding (2011). A Critique of Embodied Simulation. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (3):579-599.
Lucas P. Butler & Ellen M. Markman (2014). Preschoolers Use Pedagogical Cues to Guide Radical Reorganization of Category Knowledge. Cognition 130 (1):116-127.
Mark Jary (2013). Two Types of Implicature: Material and Behavioural. Mind and Language 28 (5):638-660.
Similar books and articles
Bruno G. Bara & Maurizio Tirassa (2010). A Mentalist Framework for Linguistic and Extralinguistic Communication. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 9:182-193.
Raymond W. Gibbs (1993). The Intentionalist Controversy and Cognitive Science. Philosophical Psychology 6 (2):181-205.
Raymond W. Gibbs Jr (1993). The Intentionalist Controversy and Cognitive Science. Philosophical Psychology 6 (2):181 – 205.
Elisabeth Pacherie (2000). The Content of Intentions. Mind and Language 15 (4):400-432.
Mark A. Sabbagh & Dare Baldwin (2005). Understanding the Role of Communicative Intentions in Word Learning. In Naomi Eilan, Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack & Johannes Roessler (eds.), Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds. Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford University Press. 165--184.
Raimo Tuomela (2002). Collective Goals and Communicative Action. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:29-64.
Steffen Borge (2009). Intentions and Compositionality. SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):100-106.
Matthew Stone, Communicative Intentions and Conversational Processes in Human-Human and Human-Computer Dialogue.
Marco Mazzone & Emanuela Campisi (2010). Are There Communicative Intentions? In L. A. Perez Miranda & A. I. Madariaga (eds.), Advances in Cognitive Science: Learning, Evolution, and Social Action. IWCogSc-10 Proceedings of the ILCLI International Workshop on Cognitive Science.
Maciej Witek (2009). Scepticism About Reflexive Intentions Refuted. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5 (1):69-83.
Added to index2010-03-16
Total downloads41 ( #44,941 of 1,102,060 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #192,049 of 1,102,060 )
How can I increase my downloads?