The ethical significance of shame: Insights of Aristotle and Xunzi

Philosophy East and West 53 (2):147-202 (2003)
: A constructive interpretation of the Confucian conception of shame is offered here. Xunzi's discussion is considered the locus classicus of the Confucian conception of shame as contrasted with honor. In order to show his conception as an articulation and development of the more inchoate attitudes of Confucius and Mencius, an excursion is made into the Lunyu and the Mengzi. Aristotle's conception of shame is used as a sort of catalyst, an opening for appreciating Xunzi's complementary insights.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/pew.2003.0013
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 19,990
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Thorian R. Harris (2014). Aristotle and Confucius on the Socioeconomics of Shame. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (3):323-342.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

33 ( #117,989 of 1,792,912 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #282,298 of 1,792,912 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.