David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):99-110 (2011)
This paper proposes a turnover to the theories which have fostered the 20th Century discourse upon the public sphere. By depicting the way in which the structural transformations suffered by the public sphere within the framework of modernity have been theorized by the pre-Habermasian discourse upon the public sphere, the present work aims at revealing the similarities as well as the differences between John Dewey‟s approach of the public sphere and Hannah Arendt‟s theory of the political realm. Although Arendt was not so much influenced by pragmatism, their theories share a normative dimension according to which the public sphere is structured in order to achieve certain functions, which were disrupted in modernity. Therefore Dewey‟s eclipse of the public, through the multiplication of its content, corresponds to Arendt‟s decay of the public realm through the rise of the social.
|Keywords||Arendt Dewey modernity decay public sphere plurality political sphere|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Asaf Bar-Tura (2010). Arendt, Habermas and Facebook: Participation and Discourse in Cyber Public Spheres. Humanities and Technology Review 29:1-25.
John S. Brady (2004). No Contest? Assessing the Agonistic Critiques of Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of the Public Sphere. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (3):331-354.
Claudio Corradetti (2011). Transitional Justice and the Truth-Constraints of the Public Sphere. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (7):685-700.
Christopher Philip Long (1998). A Fissure in the Distinction: Hannah Arendt, the Family and the Public/Private Dichotomy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (5):85-104.
Sue Thomas (2004). Reconfiguring the Public Sphere: Implications for Analyses of Educational Policy. British Journal of Educational Studies 52 (3):228 - 248.
David Randall (2011). The Prudential Public Sphere. Philosophy and Rhetoric 44 (3):205-226.
D. Ginev (2003). The Pluralistic Public Sphere From an Ontological Point of View. Critical Horizons 4 (1):75-97.
Noëlle McAfee (2008). Democracy and the Political Unconscious. Columbia University Press.
Daniel Sperling (2012). Socializing the Public: Invoking Hannah Arendt's Critique of Modernity to Evaluate Reproductive Technologies. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):53-60.
Christian Emden & David R. Midgley (eds.) (2012). Beyond Habermas: Democracy, Knowledge, and the Public Sphere. Berghahn Books.
Hsin-I. Liu (2006). The Impossibility of the Public. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:119-124.
Jens Steffek (2010). Public Accountability and the Public Sphere of International Governance. Ethics and International Affairs 24 (1):45-68.
David Willmer (2002). Parsis and Public Space in 19th Century Bombay: A Different Formulation of 'the Political' in a Non-European Context. Critical Horizons 3 (2):277-298.
Added to index2012-01-09
Total downloads9 ( #221,007 of 1,696,180 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #138,000 of 1,696,180 )
How can I increase my downloads?