David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 41 (4):309-317 (2010)
A growing number of commentators have, in recent years, noted the important affinities in the views of Immanuel Kant and Niels Bohr. While these commentators are correct, the picture they present of the connections between Bohr and Kant is painted in broad strokes; it is open to the criticism that these affinities are merely superficial. In this essay, I provide a closer, structural, analysis of both Bohr's and Kant's views that makes these connections more explicit. In particular, I demonstrate the similarities between Bohr's argument, on the one hand, that neither the wave nor the particle description of atomic phenomena pick out an object in the ordinary sense of the word, and Kant's requirement, on the other hand, that both ‘mathematical’ (having to do with magnitude) and ‘dynamical’ (having to do with an object's interaction with other objects) principles must be applicable to appearances in order for us to determine them as objects of experience. I argue that Bohr's ‘complementarity interpretation’ of quantum mechanics, which views atomic objects as idealizations, and which licenses the repeal of the principle of causality for the domain of atomic physics, is perfectly compatible with, and indeed follows naturally from a broadly Kantian epistemological framework.
|Keywords||Complementarity Niels Bohr Immanuel Kant Copenhagen interpretation Uncertainty principle Quantum mechanics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Henry E. Allison (1992). Kant's Antinomy of Teleological Judgment. Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (S1):25-42.
J. S. Bell (2004). Bertlmann's Socks and the Nature of Reality. In Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press. 139--158.
Niels Bohr (1958). Atoms and Human Knowledge. In Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. 83--93.
Niels Bohr (1937). Causality and Complementarity. Philosophy of Science 4 (3):289-298.
Niels Bohr (1935). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review 48 (696--702):696--702.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ravi Gomatam (2007). Niels Bohr's Interpretation and the Copenhagen Interpretation—Are the Two Incompatible? Philosophy of Science 74 (5):736-748.
Slobodan Perovic (2006). Schrödinger's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Relevance of Bohr's Experimental Critique. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (2):275-297.
John Honner (1987). The Description of Nature: Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Quantum Physics. Oxford University Press.
John T. Sanders (1998). Knowledge and Description: Bohr's Epistemology. In Jan Such & Malgorzata Szczesniak (eds.), Z epistemologii wiedzy naukowej. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Filozofii.
M. S. (1966). Niels Bohr in the Darkness and Light of Soviet Philosophy. Inquiry 9 (1-4):73 – 93.
S. Müller‐Markus (1966). Niels Bohr in the Darkness and Light of Soviet Philosophy∗. Inquiry 9 (1-4):73-93.
Matthew J. Brown (2014). Quantum Frames. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 45:1-10.
Klaus Meyer-Abich (2004). Bohr's Complementarity and Goldstein's Holism in Reflective Pragmatism. Mind and Matter 2 (2):91-103.
Simon Saunders (2005). Complementarity and Scientific Rationality. Foundations of Physics 35 (3):417-447.
Dugald Murdoch (1987). Niels Bohr's Philosophy of Physics. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads71 ( #22,032 of 1,101,878 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,836 of 1,101,878 )
How can I increase my downloads?