David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Utilitas 20 (4):383-408 (2008)
Kantian respect for persons is based on the special status and dignity of humanity. There are, however, at least three distinct kinds of interpretation of the principle of respect for the dignity of persons: the contractualist conception, the substantive conception and the direct conception. Contractualist theories are the most common and familiar interpretation. The contractualist assumes that some form of consent or agreement is the crucial factor that is required by respect for persons. The substantive conceptions of dignity, on the other hand, treat the concept of dignity as a substantive value that justiﬁes a deontological conception of respect for persons. A third conception of respect for the dignity of persons, the conception that I favor, focuses directly on the special value of our rational nature. According to this consequentialist conception, we respect the dignity of persons by promoting the ﬂourishing of rational nature.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert H. Myers (1999). Self-Governance and Cooperation. Oxford University Press.
Vasil Gluchman (2007). Human Dignity and Non-Utilitarian Consequentialist "Ethics of Social Consequences". The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1 (7):159-165.
Michael Otsuka (2009). The Kantian Argument for Consequentialism. Ratio 22 (1):41-58.
Philip Pettit (2000). Contractualism and Consequentialism. Theoria 66 (3):228-236.
Nicholas Southwood (2010). Contractualism and the Foundations of Morality. Oxford University Press.
Seiriol Morgan (2009). Can There Be a Kantian Consequentialism? Ratio 22 (1):19-40.
Nicholas Southwood (2008). A Deliberative Model of Contractualism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (2):183-208.
Douglas W. Portmore (2011). 7 Consequentialism. In Christian Miller (ed.), Continuum Companion to Ethics. Continuum. 143.
David Cummiskey (1990). Kantian Consequentialism. Ethics 100 (3):586-615.
Alasdair Cochrane (2010). Undignified Bioethics. Bioethics 24 (5):234-241.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads67 ( #32,055 of 1,696,615 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #115,452 of 1,696,615 )
How can I increase my downloads?