David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:163 - 175 (1978)
The thesis that subsumption is sufficient for explanation is dying out, but the thesis that it is necessary is alive and well. It is difficult to attack this thesis: non-subsumptive counter-examples are declared incomplete, or mere promissory notes. No theory, it is thought, can be explanatory unless it resorts to subsumption at some point. In this paper I attack this thesis by describing a theory that (1) would explain every event it could describe, (2) does not explain by subsumption, and (3) is fundamental in that it is understood to be irreducible (hence there are no unstated laws waiting in the wings).
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alexander Bird (1999). Explanation and Laws. Synthese 120 (1):1--18.
Shuly Wintner & Nissim Francez (1999). Off-Line Parsability and the Well-Foundedness of Subsumption. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8 (1):1-16.
Robert C. Cummins (2000). "How Does It Work" Versus "What Are the Laws?": Two Conceptions of Psychological Explanation. In F. Keil & Robert A. Wilson (eds.), Explanation and Cognition, 117-145. MIT Press
Guilin Qi & Zhizheng Zhang (2013). Preferential Semantics for Plausible Subsumption in Possibility Theory. Minds and Machines 23 (1):47-75.
Robert C. Cummins (1983). Analysis and Subsumption in the Behaviorism of Hull. Philosophy of Science 50 (March):96-111.
Richard Zaffron (1971). Identity, Subsumption, and Scientific Explanation. Journal of Philosophy 68 (23):849-860.
Carlo Vercellone (2007). From Formal Subsumption to General Intellect: Elements for a Marxist Reading of the Thesis of Cognitive Capitalism. Historical Materialism 15 (1):13-36.
P. Garbacz (2004). Subsumption and Relative Identity. Axiomathes 14 (4):341-360.
Guido Starosta (2003). Scientific Knowledge and Political Action: On the Antinomies of Lukács' Thought in "History and Class Consciousness". Science and Society 67 (1):39 - 67.
Neil Levy (2004). Epistemic Akrasia and the Subsumption of Evidence. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):149-156.
Bernard Berofsky (2010). Free Will and the Mind–Body Problem. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):1 – 19.
Ron Amundson & Laurence D. Smith (1984). Clark Hull, Robert Cummins, and Functional Analysis. Philosophy of Science 51 (December):657-666.
Steven Rappaport (1995). Economic Models and Historical Explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (4):421-441.
Theo A. F. Kuipers & Andrzej Wiśniewski (1994). An Erotetic Approach to Explanation by Specification. Erkenntnis 40 (3):377 - 402.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads18 ( #173,493 of 1,780,587 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #87,238 of 1,780,587 )
How can I increase my downloads?