Form, interpretation, and the uniqueness of content: A response to Morris
Minds and Machines 1 (1):31-42 (1991)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMichael Morris (1992). Beyond Interpretation: Reply to Cummins' Response. Minds and Machines 2 (1).
Peter Lamarque (2009). The Elusiveness of Poetic Meaning. Ratio 22 (4):398-420.
Kelly Dean Jolley (2008). (Kivy on) the Form–Content Identity Thesis. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):193-204.
Nathaniel Goldberg (2011). Interpreting Thomas Kuhn as a Response-Dependence Theorist. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (5):729 - 752.
Mark Balaguer (1998). Non-Uniqueness as a Non-Problem. Philosophia Mathematica 6 (1):63-84.
Paul G. Skokowski (1994). Can Computers Carry Content "Inexplicitly"? Minds and Machines 4 (3):333-44.
Aidan McGlynn (2012). Interpretation and Knowledge Maximization. Philosophical Studies 160 (3):391-405.
Juha Saatsi (2009). Form Vs. Content-Driven Arguments for Realism. In P. D. Magnus & Jacob Busch (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Science. Palgrave Macmillan.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #133,421 of 549,069 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,703 of 549,069 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
