I. Background

Abstract The current debate over systematicity concerns the formal conditions a scheme of mental representation must satisfy in order to explain the systematicity of thought.1 The systematicity of thought is assumed to be a pervasive property of minds, and can be characterized (roughly) as follows: anyone who can think T can think systematic variants of T, where the systematic variants of T are found by permuting T’s constituents. So, for example, it is an alleged fact that anyone who can think the thought that John loves Mary can think the thought that Mary loves John, where the latter thought is a systematic variant of the former
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified (fix it)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,664
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Only published papers are available at libraries

    Similar books and articles
    Wayne A. Davis (2005). On Begging the Systematicity Question. Journal of Philosophical Research 30:399-404.
    Robert C. Cummins (1996). Systematicity. Journal of Philosophy 93 (12):591-614.
    Barbara C. Scholz (2007). Systematicity and Natural Language Syntax. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7 (3):375-402.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-12-22

    Total downloads

    11 ( #99,458 of 549,007 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #37,272 of 549,007 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums