David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The purpose of the work reported here was to investigate the role of problem comparison and, specifically, analogical comparison in the induction of problem categories. This work was motivated by two factors. First, it is well-documented that experts and novices represent problems in very different ways and that solution success often depends on producing expert-like problem representations (DeGroot, 1965; Duncker, 1945; Chi, Feltovich, & Glaser, 1981; Hardiman, Dufresne, & Mestre, 1989; Novick, 1988; Schoenfeld & Herrmann, 1982; Silver, 1979, 1981). Second, the problem representations produced by experts and novices appear to reflect differences in the way the two groups organize their knowledge bases. Although both groups appear to represent their problem-solving knowledge in terms of problem classes, or categories, expert categories tend to be defined in terms of deep structural features, whereas novice categories tend to be defined in terms of surface features (Adelson, 1981; Chase & Simon, 1973; Chi et al., 1981; Schoenfeld &. Herrmann, 1982; Silver, 1979, 1981). Because of this differential organization, experts are more likely than novices to retrieve solution-relevant information from their categories when constructing problem representations.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christopher R. Bearman, Linden J. Ball & Thomas C. Ormerod (2007). The Structure and Function of Spontaneous Analogising in Domain-Based Problem Solving. Thinking and Reasoning 13 (3):273 – 294.
Vanessa J. Clarke Koen Lamberts (1997). Strategy Shifts and Expertise in Solving Transformation Rule Problems. Thinking and Reasoning 3 (4):271 – 290.
Merim Bilali (2008). Expert and “Novice” Problem Solving Strategies in Chess: Sixty Years of Citing de Groot (1946). Thinking and Reasoning 14 (4):395 – 408.
Fernand Gobet, Peter McLeod & Merim Bilalić (2011). Expert and “Novice” Problem Solving Strategies in Chess: Sixty Years of Citing de Groot (1946). Thinking and Reasoning 14 (4):395-408.
Timothy J. Nokes-Malach, Michelle L. Meade & Daniel G. Morrow (2012). The Effect of Expertise on Collaborative Problem Solving. Thinking and Reasoning 18 (1):32 - 58.
Benjamin M. Rottman, Dedre Gentner & Micah B. Goldwater (2012). Causal Systems Categories: Differences in Novice and Expert Categorization of Causal Phenomena. Cognitive Science 36 (5):919-932.
Nicholas Maxwell (1979). Induction, Simplicity and Scientific Progress. Scientia 114 (14):629-653.
Jan Westerhoff (2004). The Construction of Ontological Categories. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):595 – 620.
Gregory L. Murphy, Stephanie Y. Chen & Brian H. Ross (2012). Reasoning with Uncertain Categories. Thinking and Reasoning 18 (1):81 - 117.
Paliath Narendran, Frank Pfenning & Richard Statman (1997). On the Unification Problem for Cartesian Closed Categories. Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (2):636-647.
Jay B. Martin, Thomas L. Griffiths & Adam N. Sanborn (2012). Testing the Efficiency of Markov Chain Monte Carlo With People Using Facial Affect Categories. Cognitive Science 36 (1):150-162.
Kevin B. Korb (1998). The Frame Problem: An AI Fairy Tale. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 8 (3):317-351.
Jared Bates (2005). The Old Problem of Induction and the New Reflective Equilibrium. Dialectica 59 (3):347–356.
Added to index2011-08-08
Total downloads72 ( #29,212 of 1,696,808 )
Recent downloads (6 months)61 ( #2,805 of 1,696,808 )
How can I increase my downloads?