David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (2):125-130 (2007)
In order respectfully and adequately to compare Confucian and Christian conceptions of creativity, it is necessary to have proper comparative categories. Put roughly, we need to know what creativity is in order to see how Confucianism and Christianity have various versions of it. In respect of what do they agree or differ? So the first order of business is to put forward, however briefly, a theory of creativity in light of which comparisons can be made. Creativity, of course, is a very complicated notion in the West and in East Asia. Two philosophical topics can reveal something of its complication: the problem of the one and the many, and the nature of change
|Keywords||Creativity One and many Change|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Wing-tsit Chan (1963). A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, N.J.,Princeton University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert Cummings Neville (2007). Special Topic: Creativity in Christianity and Confucianism. [REVIEW] Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (2):125-130.
Tu Weiming (2007). Special Topic: Creativity in Christianity and Confucianism. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (2):115-124.
Gordon D. Kaufman (2007). Special Topic: Confucian and Christian Conceptions of Creativity. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (2):105-113.
Xinzhong Yao (1996). Confucianism and Christianity: A Comparative Study of Jen and Agape. Distributed in the U.S. By International Specialized Bk. Services.
Robert Hanna (1983). The Nature of Creativity in Whitehead's Metaphysics. Philosophy Research Archives 9:109-175.
Albert Low (2006). Creative Thinking. World Futures 62 (6):455 – 463.
Maria Kronfeldner (2009). Creativity Naturalized. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):577-592.
Lewis S. Ford (2002). Can Thomas and Whitehead Complement Each Other? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):491-502.
Weihua Niu (2003). Ancient Chinese Views of Creativity. Inquiry 22 (3):29-36.
Y. J. Erden (2010). Could a Created Being Ever Be Creative? Some Philosophical Remarks on Creativity and AI Development. Minds and Machines 20 (3):349-362.
Dustin Stokes (2007). Incubated Cognition and Creativity. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (3):83-100.
Robert E. Allinson (1992). The Golden Rule as the Core Value in Confucianism & Christianity: Ethical Similarities and Differences. Asian Philosophy 2 (2):173 – 185.
Graeme Ritchie (2007). Some Empirical Criteria for Attributing Creativity to a Computer Program. Minds and Machines 17 (1):67-99.
Arthur I. Miller (2007). Unconscious Thought, Intuition, and Visual Imagery: A Critique of "Working Memory, Cerebellum, and Creativity". Creativity Research Journal 19 (1):47-48.
Added to index2010-09-01
Total downloads5 ( #224,470 of 1,099,047 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #175,277 of 1,099,047 )
How can I increase my downloads?