Adaptive flexibility, testosterone, and mating fitness: Are low FA individuals the pinnacle of evolution?
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):599-600 (2000)
The expansion of human evolutionary theory into the domain of personal and environmental determinants of mating strategies is applauded. Questions are raised about the relation between fluctuating asymmetry (FA), testosterone, and body size and their effects on male behavior and outcomes. Low FA males' short-term mating pattern is considered in the context of an evolved tendency for closer and longer human relationships.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Elizabeth M. Hill (2000). Conditional Mating Strategies Are Contingent on Return From Investment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):605-606.
Robin Fox (1998). Testosterone is Not Alone: Internal Secretions and External Behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):375-376.
Ian Vine (2000). “What's Love Got to Do with It?” Self-Awareness and Human Mating Strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):622-623.
Agustin Fuentes (2000). Human Mating Models Can Benefit From Comparative Primatology and Careful Methodology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):602-603.
Steven W. Gangestad & Jeffry A. Simpson (2000). Trade-Offs, the Allocation of Reproductive Effort, and the Evolutionary Psychology of Human Mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):624-636.
Steven Mithen (2000). Evolution of Mating Strategies: Evidence From the Fossil and Archaeological Records. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):615-616.
Klaus Jaffe (1999). On the Adaptive Value of Some Mate Selection Strategies. Acta Biotheoretica 47 (1):29-40.
April L. Bleske & David M. Buss (2000). A Comprehensive Theory of Human Mating Must Explain Between-Sex and Within-Sex Differences in Mating Strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):593-594.
Steven W. Gangestad & Jeffry A. Simpson (2000). The Evolution of Human Mating: Trade-Offs and Strategic Pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):573-587.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #484,326 of 1,934,793 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,672 of 1,934,793 )
How can I increase my downloads?