Commentary on the paper by H.c. Byerly and R.e. Michod, “fitness and evolutionary explanation”

Biology and Philosophy 6 (1) (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Social revolution. [REVIEW]Jonathan Birch - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (4):571-581.
Byerly and Michod on fitness.John Maynard Smith - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (1):37-37.
Fitness as a Function.Henry Byerly - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:494 - 501.
Commentary on Byerly and Michod.James G. Lennox - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (1):33-37.
Some reflections on evolutionary theories, with a classification of fitness.Klaus Henle - 1991 - Acta Biotheoretica 39 (2):91-106.
A Defense of Propensity Interpretations of Fitness.Robert C. Richardson & Richard M. Burian - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:349 - 362.
The evolution of theoretically useful traits.Rowland Stout - 1998 - Biology and Philosophy 13 (4):529-540.
The propensity interpretation of fitness.Susan K. Mills & John H. Beatty - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (2):263-286.
Fitness and evolutionary explanation. [REVIEW]Henry C. Byerly & Richard E. Michod - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (1):45-53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
14 (#965,243)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references