David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 66 (2):273 - 289 (1986)
Richard Rorty in his recent book, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, 1 offers a wide ranging critique of that version of modern philosophy which understands itself fundamentally as a theory of knowledge. He attacks analytic philosophy as well as phenomenology for falling into a sort of trap laid for us in the period of classical modern philosophy by most everyone from Descartes and Locke to Kant. I want to focus on just one element in Rorty's critique - namely, that there persists on virtually all philosophic fronts an unacceptable view of knowledge as mirror-like representation of the physical world. In particular, I want to argue that Edmund Husserl's phenomenology - one of Rorty's many targets - does not rely on such a representational theory of knowledge (specifically, of perception) and consequently does not fall to Rorty's criticism. Indeed, I want to suggest that Husserl's view (with certain suitable modifications) offers one of the few plausible approaches available to us in dealing with questions of human knowledge.
|Keywords||Rorty Husserl human knowledge mirror-like representation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Matt Bower (2014). Affectively Driven Perception: Toward a Non-Representational Phenomenology. Husserl Studies 30 (3):225-245.
Similar books and articles
Brian Harding (2005). Epoché, the Transcendental Ego, and Intersubjectivity in Husserl's Phenomenology. Journal of Philosophical Research 30:141-156.
Robert Hood (1998). Rorty and Postmodern Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 20 (2):183-193.
Allan Casebier (1988). Transcendence, Transparency, and Transaction: Husserl's Middle Road to Cinematic Representation. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 5 (2):127-141.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (2000). A Merleau-Pontyian Critique of Husserl's and Searle's Representationalist Accounts of Action. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (3):287–302.
Christopher J. Voparil (2006). Richard Rorty: Politics and Vision. Rowman & Littlefield.
Alan R. Malachowski, Jo Burrows & Richard Rorty (eds.) (1990). Reading Rorty: Critical Responses to Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (and Beyond). B. Blackwell.
Paul Ricœur (1967/2007). Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
R. O. Elveton (1970). The Phenomenology of Husserl. Chicago,Quadrangle Books.
Philip Cam (1978). "Rorty Revisited", or "Rorty Revised"? Philosophical Studies 33 (May):377-86.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #96,376 of 1,793,270 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #79,368 of 1,793,270 )
How can I increase my downloads?