David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 66 (2):273 - 289 (1986)
Richard Rorty in his recent book, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, 1 offers a wide ranging critique of that version of modern philosophy which understands itself fundamentally as a theory of knowledge. He attacks analytic philosophy as well as phenomenology for falling into a sort of trap laid for us in the period of classical modern philosophy by most everyone from Descartes and Locke to Kant. I want to focus on just one element in Rorty's critique - namely, that there persists on virtually all philosophic fronts an unacceptable view of knowledge as mirror-like representation of the physical world. In particular, I want to argue that Edmund Husserl's phenomenology - one of Rorty's many targets - does not rely on such a representational theory of knowledge (specifically, of perception) and consequently does not fall to Rorty's criticism. Indeed, I want to suggest that Husserl's view (with certain suitable modifications) offers one of the few plausible approaches available to us in dealing with questions of human knowledge.
|Keywords||Rorty Husserl human knowledge mirror-like representation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Brian Harding (2005). Epoché, the Transcendental Ego, and Intersubjectivity in Husserl's Phenomenology. Journal of Philosophical Research 30:141-156.
Philip Cam (1978). "Rorty Revisited", or "Rorty Revised"? Philosophical Studies 33 (May):377-86.
R. O. Elveton (1970). The Phenomenology of Husserl. Chicago,Quadrangle Books.
Paul Ricœur (1967/2007). Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Alan R. Malachowski, Jo Burrows & Richard Rorty (eds.) (1990). Reading Rorty: Critical Responses to Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (and Beyond). B. Blackwell.
Christopher J. Voparil (2006). Richard Rorty: Politics and Vision. Rowman & Littlefield.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (2000). XIV: A Merleau-Pontyian Critique of Husserl's and Searle's Representationalist Accounts of Action. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (3):287–302.
Allan Casebier (1988). Transcendence, Transparency, and Transaction: Husserl's Middle Road to Cinematic Representation. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 5 (2):127-141.
Robert Hood (1998). Rorty and Postmodern Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 20 (2):183-193.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #76,570 of 1,103,010 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,820 of 1,103,010 )
How can I increase my downloads?