Graduate studies at Western
Faith and Philosophy 24 (2):165-184 (2007)
|Abstract||In his June 1643 letter to Princess Elizabeth, Descartes makes a claim that is a bit surprising given the hyper-intellectualism of the Meditations and other texts. He says that philosophy is something that we should do only rarely. Here I show how Descartes’ recommendation falls out of other components of his system—in particular his stoicism and his views on embodiment. A consequence of my reading is that to an important degree the reasoning of the Fourth Meditation is the imprecise reasoning of a not-yet-Cartesian meditator|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Laurence Devillairs (2001). La Première Méditation de Descartes et le De beata vita d'Augustin. Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 2:119-132.
Stephen Gaukroger (2002). Descartes' System of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
René Descartes (1996). Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections From the Objections and Replies. Cambridge University Press.
Bernd Magnus, James Benjamin Wilbur & Laurence J. Lafleur (eds.) (1970). Cartesian Essays: A Collection of Critical Studies. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff.
John Cottingham (ed.) (1994). Reason, Will, and Sensation: Studies in Descartes's Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Olli Lagerspetz (2010). Descartes' Error, with Reference to the Third and Fourth Meditations. Philosophical Investigations 33 (4):303-320.
Andrea Christofidou (2001). Descartes' Dualism: Correcting Some Misconceptions. Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2):215-238.
Tom Vinci (2011). Argument and Persuasion in Descartes' Meditations. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):497-498.
Deborah J. Brown (2006). Descartes and the Passionate Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,359 of 723,429 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 723,429 )
How can I increase my downloads?