The Normative Web: An Argument for Moral Realism
Oxford University Press (2007)
| Abstract | Moral realism of a paradigmatic sort -- Defending the parallel -- The parity premise -- Epistemic nihilism -- Epistemic expressivism : traditional views -- Epistemic expressivism : nontraditional views -- Epistemic reductionism -- Three objections to the core argument. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Moral realism Ethics Realism Epistemics | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Buy the book | Amazon page | |||||||||
| Call number | BJ1012.C84 2007 | |||||||||
| ISBN(s) | 019958138X 9780199218837 0199218838 | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSimon Kirchin (2009). The Normative Web: An Argument for Moral Realism • by Terence Cuneo. Analysis 69 (1):189-190.
Neil Sinclair (2011). The Explanationist Argument for Moral Realism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):1-24.
Heimir Geirsson (2005). Moral Twin-Earth and Semantic Moral Realism. Erkenntnis 62 (3):353 - 378.
Boran Berčić (2006). Devitt on Moral Realism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):63-68.
Michael Devitt (2002). Moral Realism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):1-15.
James Dreier (1992). The Supervenience Argument Against Moral Realism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):13-38.
Daniel Star (2010). Review of Terence Cuneo, The Normative Web: An Argument for Moral Realism (OUP, 2007). [REVIEW] Mind 119 (473):210-215.
David Enoch (2009). How is Moral Disagreement a Problem for Realism? Journal of Ethics 13 (1):15 - 50.
Chris Heathwood (2009). Moral and Epistemic Open-Question Arguments. Philosophical Books 50:83-98.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads90 ( #7,765 of 549,130 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,303 of 549,130 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
