The pen and the Sword: Recovering the disciplinary identity of physiology and anatomy before 1800 - II: Old anatomy-the Sword
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (1):51-76 (2003)
Following the exploration of the disciplinary identity of physiology before 1800 in the previous paper of this pair, the present paper seeks to recover the complementary identity of the discipline of anatomy before 1800. The manual, artisanal character of anatomy is explored via some of its practitioners, with special attention being given to William Harvey and Albrecht von Haller. Attention is particularly drawn to the important role of experiment in anatomical research and practice-which has been misread by historians as physiological experiment. Although scientific status was claimed by some practitioners for the discipline, the knife remained the tool of the discipline. Finally the differences between the teleological assumptions underlying anatomy, and the 'argument from design' or natural theology are explored.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dr Lambros Malafouris (2008). Is It 'Me' or is It 'Mine'? The Mycenaean Sword as a Body-Part. In Cogprints.
Tatjana Buklijas (2010). Public Anatomies in Fin - de - Siècle Vienna. Medicine Studies 2 (1):71-92.
Helene Sophrin Porte (2005). Procedural Replay: The Anatomy and Physics of the Sleep Spindle. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):79-80.
James S. Terry (1985). The Humanities and Gross Anatomy: Forgotten Alternatives. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 6 (2):90-98.
Jack Coulehan (2002). Anatomy of Anatomy, by Meryl Levin. New York: Third Rail Press, 2000. 133 Pp. [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (04):415-417.
Tamás Demeter (2012). The Anatomy and Physiology of Mind: Hume's Vitalistic Account. In H. F. J. Horstmanshoff, H. King & C. Zittel (eds.), Blood, Sweat and Tears: The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe. Brill.
Catherine Waldby (2000). Virtual Anatomy: From the Body in the Text to the Body on the Screen. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities 21 (2):85-107.
T. Fountain (2010). Anatomy Education and the Observational-Embodied Look. Medicine Studies 2 (1):49-69.
A. Cunningham (2002). The Pen and the Sword: Recovering the Disciplinary Identity of Physiology and Anatomy Before 1800 - I: Old Physiology-the Pen. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (4):631-665.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #267,530 of 1,101,833 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #306,516 of 1,101,833 )
How can I increase my downloads?