Philosophical sisters, incite!
Hypatia 19 (4):235 - 238 (2004)
| Abstract | Editor's note: this is the second essay in Hypatia's series of musings. We welcome reflections on the state of the profession, the life of the independent scholar, political activism, teaching, publishing, or other topics of interest to feminist philosophers. We particularly invite submissions that pick up conversational threads begun by earlier contributions to the column, so that Musings becomes a forum for talking to one another. If you have an idea for the column, please tell us about it | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMartin P. Harney (1932). The Sisters of Mercy. Thought 6 (4):695-698.
Edward F. Garesché (1947). Sisters of Maryknoll. Thought 22 (3):546-547.
Mary Margaret Johanning (1988). Theology and Governance in Religious Life. Philosophy and Theology 3 (1):73-88.
Gottfried Dietze (1965). Will the Presidency Incite Assassination? Ethics 76 (1):14-32.
Somer Brodribb (1992). Critical Response to "Machiavelli's Sisters" by Linda Zerilli. Political Theory 20 (2):332-336.
Stephen Maddison (2000). Fags, Hags, and Queer Sisters: Gender Dissent and Heterosocial Bonds in Gay Culture. St. Martin's Press.
Louise Antony (1995). Sisters, Please, I'd Rather Do It Myself. Philosophical Topics 23 (2):59-94.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #113,901 of 548,970 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,970 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
