Graduate studies at Western
Oxford University Press (2004)
|Abstract||Philosophical questions about the arts go naturally with other kinds of questions about them. Art is sometimes said to be an historical concept. But where in our cultural and biological history did art begin? If art is related to play and imagination, do we find any signs of these things in our nonhuman relatives? Sometimes the other questions look like ones the philosopher of art has to answer. Anyone who thinks that interpretation in the arts is an activity that leaves the intentions of the author behind needs to explain how and why this differs so fundamentally from ordinary conversational interpretation, where the only decent models we have are ones that depend crucially on the recovery of intention. Anyone who thinks that imaginative literature has anything to tell us about time had better have a position on how earlier and later relate to past and future. Anyone who thinks that empathy plays a role in literary engagement had better have a psychologically plausible account of what empathy is. Philosophical questions about the arts also go naturally with other kinds of philosophical questions: we can't think constructively about representation in art without thinking about representation; text, meaning, reference and existence get similarly drawn into the conversation. Some ideas that philosophers of art deal with emerge from other disciplines. In literary theory an enormous amount of attention has been lavished on tracing the sources of unreliability in narrative. Is the result adequate to the details of the particular works we call unreliable? Contemporary film theory is generally hostile to the fiction/documentary distinction. Are there in fact any grounds for this? This book of thirteen connected essays examines questions of all these kinds. It ranges from the semantics of proper names, through the pragmatics of literary and filmic interpretation, to the aesthetic function of stone age implements. Some of the essays have not been published before; some that have are here substantially revised.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$17.98 used (89% off) $54.00 direct from Amazon (10% off) $92.06 new (40% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BH39.C87 2004|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jean-Luc Nancy (1996). The Muses. Stanford University Press.
Salim Kemal & Ivan Gaskell (eds.) (1993). Landscape, Natural Beauty, and the Arts. Cambridge University Press.
David Davies (2009). Works and Performances in the Performing Arts. Philosophy Compass 4 (5):744-755.
Karol Berger (2000). A Theory of Art. Oxford University Press.
Gérard Genette (2005). Essays in Aesthetics. University of Nebraska Press.
Stephen Davies (2006). The Philosophy of Art. Blackwell Pub..
Salim Kemal & Ivan Gaskell (eds.) (1993). Explanation and Value in the Arts. Cambridge University Press.
Jerrold Levinson (2006). Contemplating Art: Essays in Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Philip Alperson (ed.) (1992). The Philosophy of the Visual Arts. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #40,698 of 740,456 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,456 )
How can I increase my downloads?