Graduate studies at Western
Utilitas 21 (2):217-221 (2009)
|Abstract||Suppose the following: Two groups of people require our aid but we can help only one group; there are more people in the first group than the second group; every person in both groups has an equal claim on our aid; and we have a duty to help and no other special obligations or duties. I argue that there exists at least one fairness function, which is a function that measures the goodness of degrees of fairness, that implies that we should follow a procedure of proportional chances to determine which group to aid.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Luke Glynn (2010). Deterministic Chance. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (1):51–80.
Peter Cholak, Rod Downey & Stephen Walk (2002). Maximal Contiguous Degrees. Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (1):409-437.
Su Gao (1994). The Degrees of Conditional Problems. Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (1):166-181.
Justin C. Fisher (2006). On Higher-Order and Free-Floating Chances. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (4):691-707.
Marc Lange (2006). Do Chances Receive Equal Treatment Under the Laws? Or: Must Chances Be Probabilities? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):383-403.
Guohua Wu (2004). Bi-Isolation in the D.C.E. Degrees. Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (2):409 - 420.
Penelope Mackie (2000). Causes, Chances, and Degrees of Effectiveness: Reply to Mellor. Analysis 60 (4):359–363.
Penelope Mackie (2000). Mellor on Causes, Chances and Degrees of Effectiveness. Analysis 60 (265):63–71.
Gordon G. Sollars (2001). An Appraisal of Shareholder Proportional Liability. Journal of Business Ethics 32 (4):329 - 345.
Added to index2009-04-28
Total downloads38 ( #35,926 of 739,873 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,873 )
How can I increase my downloads?