Non-therapeutic modification and self-interest: Reply to schramme
Bioethics 22 (8):455-456 (2008)
| Abstract | In this article I reply to Thomas Schramme's argument that there are no good reasons for the prohibition of severe forms of voluntary non-therapeutic body modification. I argue that on paternalistic assumptions there is, in fact, a perfectly good reason. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWill Johncock (2012). Modifying the Modifier: Body Modification as Social Incarnation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (3):241-259.
Mike McNamee & Thomas Schramme (2011). Moral Theory and Theorizing in Healthcare Ethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):365-368.
Thomas Schramme (2006). Michael Schefczyk: Umverteilung AlS Legitimationsproblem. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (5).
Derek Hill & Caroline Jones (eds.) (2003). Forms of Ethical Thinking in Therapeutic Practice. Open University Press.
Thomas Schramme (2010). New Trends in Philosophy of Psychiatry. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (1):1-4.
Debra S. Borys (1994). Maintaining Therapeutic Boundaries: The Motive is Therapeutic Effectiveness, Not Defensive Practice. Ethics and Behavior 4 (3):267 – 273.
Ingmar Pörn (1983). On the Logic of Adverbs. Studia Logica 42 (2-3):293 - 298.
Sally Sheldon & Stephen Wilkinson (1998). Female Genital Mutilation and Cosmetic Surgery: Regulating Non-Therapeutic Body Modification. Bioethics 12 (4):263–285.
Thomas Schramme (2010). Paternalism and Self-Interest: A Rejoinder. Bioethics 24 (4):208-210.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads17 ( #71,221 of 551,625 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,370 of 551,625 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
