Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (4):556–571 (2003)
|Abstract||Article responds to the criticism of speciesism that it is somehow less immoral than other -isms by showing that this is a mistake resting on an inadequate taxonomy of the various -isms. Criticizes argument by Bonnie Steinbock that preference to your own species is not immoral by comparison with racism of comparable level.|
|Keywords||speciesism Peter Singer preference Bonnie Steinbock agentism personhood moral agency|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dorit Bar-on (2009). Transparency, Epistemic Impartiality, and Personhood: A Commentary on Simon Evnine'sepistemic Dimensions of Personhood. Philosophical Books 50 (1):1-14.
Daniel M. Hausman (2005). Sympathy, Commitment, and Preference. Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):33-50.
Oscar Horta (2010). What is Speciesism? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):243-266.
Arthur Zucker (1996). Ferré: Organicistic Connectedness—But Still Speciesistic. Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):185 - 190.
Tzachi Zamir (2006). Is Speciesism Opposed to Liberationism? Philosophia 34 (4):465-475.
John Carroll (1993). Humanism: The Wreck of Western Culture. Fontana Press.
Roger Wertheimer (2007). The Relevance of Speciesism to Life Sciences Practices. In Fred Adams (ed.), Ethics and the Life Sciences. Philosophy Document Center.
Jim Herrick (2003/2005). Humanism: An Introduction. Prometheus Books.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads113 ( #6,118 of 735,012 )
Recent downloads (6 months)51 ( #1,108 of 735,012 )
How can I increase my downloads?