Grazer Philosophische Studien 10 (1):65-71 (1980)
|Abstract||Gilbert Ryle has argued that Plato's Theory of Forms is a "logically vicious" doctrine because it's fundamental concept of exemplification leads to a vicious infinite regress. David Armstrong and Alan Donagan have agreed with Ryle. After making Ryle's argument logically explicit, I show the exemplification regress is illusory. Exemplification is a genuine universal alongside other relations; there is nothing paradoxical in its being exemplified over and over and over ... Platonism can define logical properties of this relation but not the relation itself, however.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Desh Raj Sirswal (2007). GILBERRT RYLE ON DESCARTES' MYTH. K.U. Research Journal of Arts and Humanities (Jan.-Dec.2007):81-86.
Mark Textor (2008). Samples as Symbols. Ratio 21 (3):344-359.
Yuri Cath (forthcoming). Regarding a Regress. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly.
Desh Raj Sirswal (2010). Ryle’s Dispositional Analysis of Mind and its Relevance. Review Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences (April, 2010):103-112.
Irving Block (1964). Plato, Parmenides, Ryle and Exemplification. Mind 73 (291):417-422.
Arnold Cusmariu (1978). Self-Relations. Southern Journal of Philosophy 16 (4):321-327.
Cusmariu Arnold (1980). Ryle's Paradox and the Concept of Exemplification. Grazer Philosophische Studien 10 (2):65-71.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-09-28
Total downloads1 ( #274,830 of 549,084 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,084 )
How can I increase my downloads?