Theory Construction and Selection in Modern Physics: The S Matrix
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1990)
One of the major philosophical problems in physical sciences is what criteria should determine how scientific theories are selected and justified in practice and whether, in describing observable physical phenomena, such theories are effectively constrained to be unique. This book studies the example of a particular theory, the S-matrix theory. The S-matrix program was initiated by Heisenberg to deal with difficulties encountered in quantum field theories in describing particular phenomena. Since then, each theory has at different times been favored as the explanation of observed phenomena. Certainly the S-matrix theory was adequate, feasible and fertile. However, the quantum field theory interpretation is now widely accepted and the study of alternative theories is all but abandoned. By examining the philosophy which influenced the turns in this story, the author explains how an adequate and viable theory fell out of favor and concludes with a critique of different methodologies in the history of science.
|Keywords||S-matrix theory Physics Philosophy Physics Methodology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$83.46 used (21% off) $84.02 new (20% off) $104.99 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||QC174.35.S2.C87 2005|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Tian Yu Cao & Silvan S. Schweber (1993). The Conceptual Foundations and the Philosophical Aspects of Renormalization Theory. Synthese 97 (1):33 - 108.
Darrin W. Belousek (2005). Underdetermination, Realism, and Theory Appraisal: An Epistemological Reflection on Quantum Mechanics. [REVIEW] Foundations of Physics 35 (4):669-695.
Eduard Prugovečki (1996). On Locality in Quantum General Relativity and Quantum Gravity. Foundations of Physics 26 (12):1645-1668.
Michael Redhead (2005). Broken Bootstraps---The Rise and Fall of a Research Programme. Foundations of Physics 35 (4):561-575.
Eduard Prugovečki (1992). Realism, Positivism, Instrumentalism, and Quantum Geometry. Foundations of Physics 22 (2):143-186.
Similar books and articles
Sunny Y. Auyang (1995). How is Quantum Field Theory Possible? Oxford University Press.
August Stern (1994). The Quantum Brain: Theory and Implications. North-Holland/Elsevier.
Michael Redhead (1995). From Physics to Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.
James T. Cushing (1998). Philosophical Concepts in Physics: The Historical Relation Between Philosophy and Scientific Theories. Cambridge University Press.
Jan Rzewuski (1967). Field Theory. London, Iliffe.
James T. Cushing (1982). Models and Methodologies in Current Theoretical High-Energy Physics. Synthese 50 (1):5 - 101.
James T. Cushing (1982). Models, High-Energy Theoretical Physics and Realism. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:31 - 56.
Paul M. Clark (ed.) (1981). Modern Physics and Problems of Knowledge. Open University Press.
August Stern (1992). Matrix Logic and Mind: A Probe Into a Unified Theory of Mind and Matter. Distributors for the U.S. And Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?