David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:211 - 223 (1984)
Examples, mainly from research in current physics, are used to examine and illustrate the network of factors which produce in scientific debate a convergence of opinion to a generally accepted set of laws and theories. Also addressed is the question of the reliability of these general theories as a faithful representation of the complexity of physical reality.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mark I. M. Noble & Angela J. Drake-Holland (1986). Discrepancies Between Scientific Theory and Practice in Relation to Physiological Hypotheses. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (3).
Jon Dorling & Dorothy Edgington (1976). The Applicability of Bayesian Convergence-of-Opinion Theorems to the Case of Actual Scientific Inference. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (2):160-161.
Mark B. Couch (2005). Functional Properties and Convergence in Biology. Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1041-1051.
James Hawthorne (1994). On the Nature of Bayesian Convergence. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:241 - 249.
Antonio López Peláez & José Antonio Díaz (2007). Science, Technology and Democracy: Perspectives About the Complex Relation Between the Scientific Community, the Scientific Journalist and Public Opinion. Social Epistemology 21 (1):55 – 68.
Neven Sesardić (1992). Science and Politics: Dangerous Liaisons. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 23 (1):129-151.
James T. Cushing (1998). Philosophical Concepts in Physics: The Historical Relation Between Philosophy and Scientific Theories. Cambridge University Press.
George Khushf (2007). Open Questions in the Ethics of Convergence. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (3):299 – 310.
C. Z. Elgin (1980). Lawlikeness and the End of Science. Philosophy of Science 47 (1):56-68.
Joachim Schummer, From Nano-Convergence to NBIC-Convergence: “The Best Way to Predict the Future is to Create It”.
Joel Kenton Press (2008). The Scientific Use of 'Representation' and 'Function': Avoiding Explanatory Vacuity. Synthese 161 (1):119 - 139.
Roman Frigg (2006). Scientific Representation and the Semantic View of Theories. Theoria 21 (1):49-65.
Helen J. Knowles, Clerkish Control of Recent Supreme Court Opinions? A Case Study of Justice Kennedy's Opinion in Gonzales Vs. Carhart.
Roger M. Cooke (1991). Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads1 ( #306,410 of 1,089,063 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,801 of 1,089,063 )
How can I increase my downloads?