Graduate studies at Western
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:211 - 223 (1984)
|Abstract||Examples, mainly from research in current physics, are used to examine and illustrate the network of factors which produce in scientific debate a convergence of opinion to a generally accepted set of laws and theories. Also addressed is the question of the reliability of these general theories as a faithful representation of the complexity of physical reality.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mark I. M. Noble & Angela J. Drake-Holland (1986). Discrepancies Between Scientific Theory and Practice in Relation to Physiological Hypotheses. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (3).
Jon Dorling & Dorothy Edgington (1976). The Applicability of Bayesian Convergence-of-Opinion Theorems to the Case of Actual Scientific Inference. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (2):160-161.
Mark B. Couch (2005). Functional Properties and Convergence in Biology. Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1041-1051.
James Hawthorne (1994). On the Nature of Bayesian Convergence. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:241 - 249.
Antonio López Peláez & José Antonio Díaz (2007). Science, Technology and Democracy: Perspectives About the Complex Relation Between the Scientific Community, the Scientific Journalist and Public Opinion. Social Epistemology 21 (1):55 – 68.
Neven Sesardić (1992). Science and Politics: Dangerous Liaisons. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 23 (1):129-151.
James T. Cushing (1998). Philosophical Concepts in Physics: The Historical Relation Between Philosophy and Scientific Theories. Cambridge University Press.
George Khushf (2007). Open Questions in the Ethics of Convergence. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (3):299 – 310.
C. Z. Elgin (1980). Lawlikeness and the End of Science. Philosophy of Science 47 (1):56-68.
Joachim Schummer, From Nano-Convergence to NBIC-Convergence: “The Best Way to Predict the Future is to Create It”.
Joel Kenton Press (2008). The Scientific Use of 'Representation' and 'Function': Avoiding Explanatory Vacuity. Synthese 161 (1):119 - 139.
Roman Frigg (2006). Scientific Representation and the Semantic View of Theories. Theoria 21 (1):49-65.
Helen J. Knowles, Clerkish Control of Recent Supreme Court Opinions? A Case Study of Justice Kennedy's Opinion in Gonzales Vs. Carhart.
Roger M. Cooke (1991). Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads1 ( #292,081 of 739,305 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,305 )
How can I increase my downloads?