Ambiguities and irresolvable tensions in the Ada: A reply to Loretta M. Kopelman and Anita Silvers
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2) (1996)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLoretta M. Kopelman (2004). Adolescents as Doubly-Vulnerable Research Subjects. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):50-52.
Loretta M. Kopelman (1990). Philosophical Critique of Bioethics: Introduction to the Issue. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2).
Loretta M. Kopelman (2000). Children as Research Subjects: A Dilemma. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (6):723-744.
Loretta Kopelman & Gregory E. Pence (1985). Reviews. [REVIEW] Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 6 (2).
Loretta M. Kopelman (1992). Introduction. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (2):121-126.
Loretta Kopelman (1986). Review. [REVIEW] Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (1).
David Wasserman (1994). Impairment, Disadvantage, and Equality: A Reply to Anita Silvers. Journal of Social Philosophy 25 (3):181-188.
Loretta M. Kopelman (1996). Ethical Assumptions and Ambiguities in the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):187-208.
M. A. Gardell Cutter (1996). Ambiguities and Irresolvable Tensions in the ADA: A Reply to Loretta M. Kopelman and Anita Silvers. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):225-235.
Loretta M. Kopelman (2004). Minimal Risk as an International Ethical Standard in Research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (3):351 – 378.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-24Total downloads3 ( #201,781 of 549,014 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
