David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Male and female participants were instructed to produce an altered response pattern on an Implicit Association Test measure of gender identity by slowing performance in trials requiring the same response to stimuli designating own gender and self. Participants’ faking success was found to be predictable by a measure of slowing relative to unfaked performances. This combined task slowing (CTS) indicator was then applied in reanalyses of three experiments from other laboratories, two involving instructed faking and one involving possibly motivated faking. Across all studies involving instructed faking, CTS correctly classiﬁed 75% of intentionally faking participants. Using the CTS index to adjust faked Implicit Association Test scores increased the correlation of CTS-adjusted measures with known group membership, relative to unadjusted (i.e., faked) measures
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Zev M. Trachtenberg (2005). William Ian Miller, Faking It:Faking It. Ethics 116 (1):247-250.
Robert Elliot (1982). Faking Nature. Inquiry 25 (1):81 – 93.
Brian C. Tietje, Is the Implicit Association Test a Valid and Valuable Measure of Implicit Consumer Social Cognition?
J. Thompson (2001). Faking Nature: The Ethics of Environmental Restoration. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (2):290 – 291.
Robin M. James (2007). Deconstruction, Fetishism, and the Racial Contract: On the Politics of "Faking It" in Music. CR 7 (1):45-80.
D. Maison, Anthony G. Greenwald & R. H. Bruin (2004). Predictive Validity of the Implicit Association Test in Studies of Brands, Consumer Attitudes, and Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 14:405-415.
Eric Luis Uhlmann, Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-Analysis of Predictive Validity.
Debbie E. McGhee & Jordan L. K. Schwartz, Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test.
William Ian Miller (2003). Faking It. Cambridge University Press.
Anthony Greenwald, A Unified Theory of Implicit Attitudes, Stereotypes, Self-Esteem, and Self-Concept.
Anthony Greenwald, The Implicit Association Test's D Measure Can Minimize a Cognitive Skill Confound: Comment on McFarland and Crouch (2002).
C. A. Seger (1998). Independent Judgment-Linked and Motor-Linked Forms of Artificial Grammar Learning. Consciousness and Cognition 7 (2):259-284.
Roy Sorenson (2000). Faking Munchausen’s Syndrome. Analysis 60 (266):202–208.
Added to index2011-06-20
Total downloads5 ( #178,805 of 1,089,048 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,722 of 1,089,048 )
How can I increase my downloads?