David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (03):317-321 (2007)
Once a neural implant has shown some efficacy during initial research trials, it begins to enter the world of clinical application. This culminates when the implant becomes approved for a particular indication. However, the ethical challenges continue as the technology is adopted as a standard of practice. Patient eligibility criteria, as documented by inclusion and exclusion criteria with any new treatment, are not always clearly quantified and defined. These vagaries can result in considerable debate regarding who should or should not proceed with surgery. There is often considerable room for clinical judgment that can result in extension of the treatment to a wider range of patients. The ethical questions that arise in clinical decisionmaking differ significantly from those inherent in engineering design and research development
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul J. Ford (2007). Neurosurgical Implants: Clinical Protocol Considerations. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (03):308-311.
Francois Berger, Sjef Gevers, Ludwig Siep & Klaus-Michael Weltring (2008). Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects of Brain-Implants Using Nano-Scale Materials and Techniques. NanoEthics 2 (3):241-249.
Steffen Rosahl (2004). Vanishing Senses—Restoration of Sensory Functions by Electronic Implants. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (4):285-295.
Dena S. Davis (1997). Cochlear Implants and the Claims of Culture? A Response to Lane and Grodin. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (3):253-258.
George J. Agich (2005). What Kind of Doing is Clinical Ethics? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (1):7-24.
Peter Singer, Edmund Pellegrino & Mark Siegler (2001). Clinical Ethics Revisited. BMC Medical Ethics 2 (1):1-8.
Laurence B. McCullough (2005). The Critical Turn in Clinical Ethics and its Continous Enhancement. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):1 – 8.
David C. Thomasma (1994). Clinical Ethics as Medical Hermeneutics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (2).
Katrina Sifferd (2012). Changing the Criminal Character: Nanotechnology and Criminal Punishment. In A. Santosuosso (ed.), Proceedings of the 2011 Law and Science Young Scholars Symposium. Pavia University Press
Stephen L. Daniel (1994). Hermeneutical Clinical Ethics: A Commentary. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (2).
D. K. Sokol (2008). The "Four Quadrants" Approach to Clinical Ethics Case Analysis; an Application and Review. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (7):513-516.
Glenn Mcgee (1996). Phronesis in Clinical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (4).
David C. Thomasma (1991). Why Philosophers Should Offer Ethics Consultations. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
G. Hunt, C. Gannon & A. Gallagher (2012). Elements of an Engaged Clinical Ethics: A Qualitative Analysis of Hospice Clinical Ethics Committee Discussions. Clinical Ethics 7 (4):175-182.
L. B. McCullough (2013). Critical Appraisal of Clinical Judgment: An Essential Dimension of Clinical Ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (1):1-5.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads4 ( #424,619 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?