Philosophy of Science 45 (4):563-574 (1978)
|Abstract||This paper presents a theory of conclusions based upon the suggestions of Tukey . The logic offered here is based upon two rules of detachment that occur naturally in probabilistic inference, a traditional rule of acceptance, and a rule of rejection. The rules of detachment provide flexibility: the theory of conclusions can account for both statistical and deductive arguments. The rule of acceptance governs the acceptance of new conclusions, is a variant of the rule of high probability, and is a limiting case of a decision-theoretic rule of acceptance. The rule of rejection governs the removal of previously accepted conclusions on the basis of new evidence. The resulting theory of conclusions is not a decision-theoretic logic but does, through the aforementioned limiting property, provide a line of demarcation between decision and conclusion (i.e., nondecision) logics of acceptance. The theory of conclusions therefore complements decision-theoretic inference. The theory of conclusions presented here satisfies Tukey's desiderata, specifically: (1) conclusions are statements which are accepted on the basis of unusually strong evidence; (2) conclusions are to remain accepted unless and until unusually strong evidence to the contrary arises; (3) conclusions are subject to future rejection, when and if the evidence against them becomes strong enough. Finally, the proferred theory of conclusions has a strong conservative bias, reflecting Tukey's aims|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Wesley C. Salmon (1977). Hempel's Conception of Inductive Inference in Inductive-Statistical Explanation. Philosophy of Science 44 (2):179-185.
Michael E. Brady (1987). J. M. Keynes' 'Theory of Evidential Weight': Its Relation to Information Processing Theory and Application in the General Theory. Synthese 71 (1):37 - 59.
Ernest W. Adams (1996). Four Probability-Preserving Properties of Inferences. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (1):1 - 24.
D. J. Shoesmith (1978). Multiple-Conclusion Logic. Cambridge University Press.
Victoria F. Shaw (1996). The Cognitive Processes in Informal Reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 2 (1):51 – 80.
Thomas O. Nelson (2003). Relevance of Unjustified Strong Assumptions When Utilizing Signal Detection Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):351-351.
Christopher Gauker (1999). Deflationism and Logic. Facta Philosophica (1):167-199.
David H. Sanford (1975). Intermediate Conclusions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (1):61 – 64.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #277,406 of 556,912 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,912 )
How can I increase my downloads?