Philosophy and Literature 32 (2):pp. 315-329 (2008)
|Abstract||What does it mean to hold that the significant aspects of a literary passage cannot be captured in a paraphrase? Does a change in the description of an act "risk producing a different act" from the one described? Using Jane Austen as an example, we'll consider whether her use of metaphor and symbol really amounts to calling someone a prick, whether her narrative voice changes what it is that is expressed, and whether comedy can hold just as much significance as tragedy without all the heavy breathing.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
E. M. Dadlez (2008). Aesthetics and Humean Aesthetic Norms in the Novels of Jane Austen. Journal of Aesthetic Education 42 (1).
Eva M. Dadlez (2008). David Hume and Jane Austen on Pride : Ethics in the Enlightenment. In Alexander John Dick & Christina Lupton (eds.), Theory and Practice in the Eighteenth Century: Writing Between Philosophy and Literature. Pickering & Chatto.
Alice MacLachlan (2010). Mirrors to One Another: Emotions and Moral Value in Jane Austen and David Hume, E. M. Dadlez. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (2).
Timothy M. Costelloe (2010). Mirrors to One Another: Emotion and Value in Jane Austen and David Hume by Dadlez, E. M. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (2):179-181.
Sandrine Berges (2010). Mirrors to One Another: Emotion and Value in Jane Austen and David Hume – E.M. Dadlez. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (241):864-865.
E. M. Dadlez (2009). Mirrors to One Another: Emotion and Value in Jane Austen and David Hume. Wiley-Blackwell.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #71,221 of 551,054 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,341 of 551,054 )
How can I increase my downloads?