Philosophy and Literature 32 (2):pp. 330-346 (2008)
|Abstract||The hard-drinking, joke-cracking second-mate of Melville's Moby Dick doesn't receive much respect from critics. At best Stubb is seen as a comic foil, at worst as a cruel coward and mechanical optimist. Yet this perspective distorts the text and does him an injustice. In fact, Stubb can be read quite fruitfully as an exemplar of wisdom. Using recent scholarship to fill out Melville's conception of fine philosophy, a set of criteria emerges for the true philosopher according to which Stubb fares remarkably well.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Steven Dick (2012). Observatory Sciences and Culture in the Nineteenth Century. Metascience 21 (1):235-237.
Frank Arntzenius (1994). Relativistic Hidden Variable Theories? Erkenntnis 41 (2):207 - 231.
D. E. Wittkower (ed.) (2011). Philip K. Dick and Philosophy. Open Court Pub Co.
Hub Zwart (2005). Comparative Epistemology: Contours of a Research Program. Acta Biotheoretica 53 (2).
Dick Howard (2000). Marxism in the Post-Communist World. Critical Horizons 1 (1):71-92.
Milton Millhauser (1955). The Form of Moby-Dick. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 13 (4):527-532.
L. Rosenblatt (2008). The Limits of Pity in Bartleby and Moby Dick. Medical Humanities 34 (2):59-63.
Herman Melville (1851). Moby Dick; or, the Whale. Harper and Brothers.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #39,202 of 722,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?